Examkin

Question

Difficulty: HardPhysician Impairment and Peer Reporting

A 36-year-old obstetrician-gynecologist is observed by a fellow attending physician on the labor and delivery unit. Over the past two weeks, the physician has exhibited pressured speech, increased pacing, and has sent several inappropriate, tangential emails to hospital staff at all hours of the night. Today, he is scheduled to perform an elective cesarean delivery in 30 minutes. He tells his colleague that he has not slept in four days because his "mind is racing with brilliant ideas," and he excitedly describes a "revolutionary" new surgical technique he plans to attempt on the patient today, despite having no prior training in the method. The patient is currently in the preoperative holding area and is hemodynamically stable. Which of the following is the most legally and ethically appropriate next step for the fellow attending physician?

  1. Cancel the scheduled procedure with this physician, take over the patient's immediate care, and report the physician's behavior to the department chair.Answer
  2. B
    Pull the physician aside privately, convince him to go home to rest, and cover his patients without notifying administration to protect his professional reputation.
  3. C
    Allow the physician to proceed with the surgery but remain scrubbed in the operating room to immediately intervene if patient safety is compromised.
  4. D
    Postpone the surgery and order an emergent urine toxicology screen and psychiatric consultation for the colleague before notifying hospital leadership.
  5. E
    Inform the patient about the physician's current mental state so she can make an informed decision regarding whether to proceed with the surgery.

Answer

The most appropriate next step is to immediately cancel the scheduled procedure with the impaired physician, assume care of the patient to ensure safety, and report the behavior to the department chair or hospital leadership.
The correct answer addresses the two primary tenets of managing an impaired colleague: immediate patient protection and appropriate institutional reporting. Because the impaired physician is exhibiting clear signs of mania (grandiosity, lack of sleep, poor judgment) and is about to perform a surgery, the observing physician must immediately intervene to stop the procedure and take over patient care. Following this immediate stabilization of the clinical threat, the observing physician is ethically and legally obligated to report the colleague to the appropriate institutional authority, which is typically the department chair, chief medical officer, or the hospital's Physician Health Program (PHP).

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the signs of severe physician impairment.
The colleague is exhibiting classic signs of acute mania (pressured speech, decreased need for sleep, grandiosity, impulsivity), which severely impairs his clinical judgment.
Recognizing impairment is the first step in the ethical algorithm for peer reporting.
2
Assess the immediate risk to patient safety.
The physician is scheduled to perform a cesarean delivery in 30 minutes using an unproven, untrained technique.
Immediate patient harm is highly likely if the surgery proceeds.
3
Intervene directly to protect the patient.
The fellow attending must take over the patient's care and cancel the impaired physician's involvement in the surgery.
The American Medical Association (AMA) Code of Medical Ethics dictates that patient safety supersedes all other concerns.
4
Fulfill institutional reporting requirements.
The fellow attending must report the incident to the department chair, chief medical officer, or the hospital's physician health program (PHP).
Informal handling of impairment is insufficient and unethical; a formal institutional pathway must be utilized to ensure the physician gets appropriate evaluation and treatment.

Key Concept

When encountering an impaired colleague, a physician's first ethical duty is to protect patient safety by immediately removing the impaired physician from clinical duties. The second duty is to report the impairment to appropriate institutional authorities (e.g., department chair, chief of staff, or physician health program).
Rate this question

Topics

Physician Impairment and Peer Reporting

More questions from this topic