Examkin

Question

Difficulty: MediumInterprofessional Teamwork and Conflict Resolution

A telemetry nurse notes that a cross-cover resident has ordered an unusually rapid infusion of intravenous potassium chloride for a patient. The nurse recognizes that the ordered rate significantly exceeds hospital policy limits for a peripheral intravenous line and poses an immediate risk of fatal cardiac arrhythmia. According to the Two-Challenge Rule and standard communication frameworks in patient safety, arrange the following actions the nurse should take in the correct chronological sequence to resolve this conflict.

  1. 1Voice the initial concern directly to the prescribing resident regarding the unsafe infusion rate.
  2. 2Reassert the concern a second time if the resident dismisses the initial query, explicitly stating that it is a patient safety issue.
  3. 3Inform the resident that the medication will not be administered as currently ordered.
  4. 4Escalate the unresolved clinical impasse to the nursing supervisor and the attending physician.

Answer

The correct sequence of actions follows the Two-Challenge Rule and chain of command: voice the initial concern, reassert the concern explicitly as a safety issue if unacknowledged, refuse to administer the unsafe order (stop the line), and finally escalate to supervisory leadership.
In high-reliability healthcare organizations, the Two-Challenge Rule empowers any team member to stop an unsafe action. The protocol requires an individual to first state their concern directly. If ignored or dismissed, they must state it a second time (often using CUS words: Concerned, Uncomfortable, Safety). If the safety issue is still not addressed, the individual must 'stop the line' (refuse to proceed with the unsafe act) and then activate the chain of command (escalate to supervisors) to definitively resolve the conflict.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the first required action when a safety concern arises.
Voice the initial concern directly to the prescribing resident.
Direct peer-to-peer communication is always the first step to address a potential error before it reaches the patient, allowing for immediate correction without unnecessary escalation.
2
Determine the next step if the first attempt fails to correct the issue.
Reassert the concern a second time, explicitly framing it as a patient safety issue.
The Two-Challenge Rule requires voicing the concern at least twice. The second challenge must be more direct and explicitly state the safety risk to overcome communication barriers and hierarchy.
3
Decide on the immediate action required if the resident insists on the unsafe order.
Inform the resident that the medication will not be administered.
When a provider refuses to alter a dangerous order after two challenges, the clinician executing the order must definitively 'stop the line' to prevent immediate patient harm.
4
Identify how to definitively resolve the resulting clinical impasse.
Escalate the impasse to the nursing supervisor and the attending physician.
Once the line is stopped and an impasse is reached, the conflict must be resolved by activating the formal chain of command, involving leadership from both nursing and medicine.

Key Concept

The Two-Challenge Rule and Chain of Command Escalation in Patient Safety
Rate this question

Topics

Interprofessional Teamwork and Conflict Resolution

More questions from this topic