The writer is considering deleting Sentence 5 from the following paragraph:
[1] In 1856, eighteen-year-old chemistry student William Henry Perkin was attempting to synthesize quinine, a drug used to treat malaria, in his home laboratory. [2] Instead of the clear medicine he hoped for, Perkin produced a dark, sticky sludge in his beaker. [3] Cleaning the flask with alcohol, he noticed that the substance dissolved into a vibrant, purple liquid. [4] This accidental byproduct, which he named mauveine, became the world's first mass-produced synthetic organic dye. [5] Prior to Perkin’s discovery, purple clothing was a luxury reserved exclusively for royalty because the dye had to be painstakingly harvested from thousands of marine snails. [6] Recognizing the commercial potential of his creation, Perkin quickly patented the process and established a factory to manufacture the dye.
Should Sentence 5 be kept or deleted?
- Kept, because it provides historical context that explains why a mass-produced synthetic purple dye was so significant.Cevap
- BKept, because it describes the chemical composition of natural dyes compared to synthetic dyes like mauveine.
- CDeleted, because it interrupts the narrative flow by shifting the focus to the fashion preferences of royalty.
- DDeleted, because it duplicates information about the commercial production of mauveine that is introduced in Sentence 6.