In 1982, marine archaeologists raised the *Mary Rose*, a Tudor warship that sank in 1545. The recovered artifacts, which were preserved in the seabed silt for centuries, provide valuable details about life in the sixteenth century.
Which choice best punctuates the underlined portion of the sentence?
- NO CHANGECevap
- Bartifacts, that were preserved in the seabed silt for centuries, provide
- Cartifacts, which were preserved in the seabed silt for centuries provide
- Dartifacts; which were preserved in the seabed silt for centuries, provide
Cevap
The correct option is the one that makes no change to the sentence, as it correctly uses a pair of commas to enclose the nonessential relative clause 'which were preserved in the seabed silt for centuries'.
The clause 'which were preserved in the seabed silt for centuries' is a nonessential relative clause because it adds extra detail but is not required to identify which artifacts are being discussed. Nonessential clauses must be enclosed in a pair of commas. Therefore, the original phrasing with commas before 'which' and after 'centuries' is correct.
Adım Adım Çözüm
Anahtar Kavram
Punctuation of nonessential elements versus restrictive clauses
Tahmini Süre:1m 0s