A writer is editing a passage about the history of eating utensils and has drafted the following paragraph:
For centuries, Western Europeans ate their meals using only knives, spoons, and their fingers. When the Byzantine princess Maria Argyropoulina arrived in Venice in 1004 to marry the Doge's son, she brought with her a set of golden, two-pronged forks, which she used to eat her food. [1] The Venetian clergy, however, condemned the implement as an insult to God, declaring that human hands were the only tools fit to touch the food created by the heavens. Consequently, forks did not gain widespread acceptance in Italy for another several centuries.
The writer is considering adding the following sentence at Point [1]:
Princess Maria was also known for her elaborate silk gowns and gold jewelry.
Should the writer make this addition at Point [1]?
- AYes, because it provides useful detail that emphasizes the princess’s wealth and elevated royal status.
- BYes, because it explains why the Venetian clergy was so critical of her dining habits.
- No, because it interrupts the paragraph's discussion of the fork's introduction to Venice with irrelevant personal details about the princess.Cevap
- DNo, because it contradicts the paragraph's statement that forks were condemned as an insult to God.