Paragraph 1
For decades, urban planners designed public parks primarily as static recreational spaces—manicured lawns and paved pathways meant for quiet strolls. These early designs prioritized aesthetic neatness over community interaction, viewing nature as something to be observed from a distance rather than engaged with.
Paragraph 2
In contrast, contemporary urban designers view parks as dynamic community hubs. Modern park designs incorporate interactive community gardens, dog runs, and flexible event spaces that encourage active public gathering. By shifting the focus from passive observation to active engagement, these designers aim to foster stronger social bonds among city residents.
Based on the passage, how does the description of early park designs in Paragraph 1 relate to the description of modern park designs in Paragraph 2?
- Paragraph 1 describes a traditional approach to park design, while Paragraph 2 introduces a modern, contrasting approach that emphasizes community interaction.Cevap
- BParagraph 1 provides a historical timeline of urban development, while Paragraph 2 lists the specific municipal codes regulating city gardens.
- CParagraph 1 argues that modern parks are poorly constructed, while Paragraph 2 outlines the physical steps required to build a paved pathway.
- DParagraph 1 outlines a universal plan to eliminate urban green spaces, while Paragraph 2 explains the global success of that plan.