For years, Master Vance had insisted that the cracks in the fresco of the chapel of Saint Jude were not signs of decay, but rather a deliberate, subterranean language written by the original painter. As his apprentice, I was tasked not with filling the fissures with plaster, but with tracing their jagged paths on grid paper. Vance would lean over my shoulder, his breath smelling of cloves and turpentine, whispering that we were mapmakers of an ancient mind. The parish council, of course, saw only water damage and negligent delay. To them, Vance was a stubborn contractor overstaying his commission. But Vance did not care for their budget sheets or their impatience. He believed himself a scholar-custodian, and he treated the crumbling plaster with the reverence due to holy relics. My own hands, stained gray with stone dust, frequently trembled as I worked; I knew that if the archway collapsed, it would be our scaffolding, and our lives, that fell first. Yet I did not speak up. To question Vance was to risk exile from the only studio in the province that dared to treat art as something alive. I watched him touch a hairline fracture along the sleeve of a painted saint, his fingers moving with a tenderness that bordered on madness. It was in that moment I realized Vance was no longer restoring the chapel; he was waiting for it to speak to him, even if the conversation ended in our burial.
Which of the following best describes the narrator's point of view and relationship to the events described in the passage?
- A conflicted participant who assists in a hazardous project due to professional dependency, while privately recognizing the master's madness.Cevap
- BThe author of the text, who is writing a biographical critique to condemn the parish council for failing to protect historical murals.
- CA devout believer who has fully embraced the master's theory about the chapel fresco's hidden, ancient message.
- DA neutral and objective chronicler recording a dispute over building maintenance budgets and contractor delays.