Soru

Zorluk: ZorEvaluating Relevance for Adding or Deleting Content

In 1756, British civil engineer John Smeaton was commissioned to rebuild the Eddystone Lighthouse, a structure off the coast of Devon that had repeatedly succumbed to the brutal storms of the English Channel. Smeaton recognized that standard mortar, which required exposure to air to set, would dissolve long before it could cure in the spray of the sea. To address this challenge, he conducted a series of rigorous experiments testing various lime mixtures. He discovered that limestone containing a high proportion of clay, when mixed with volcanic ash, created a hydraulic mortar that actually hardened underwater. This breakthrough allowed Smeaton to successfully complete the lighthouse and laid the foundation for modern cement. Roman builders had previously used a similar mix of volcanic ash and lime to build the Pantheon, which still stands today.

Given the context of the paragraph, should the writer make this deletion?

  1. A
    Keep it, because it provides relevant historical context that establishes the long-term durability of the lime mixture.
  2. B
    Keep it, because it demonstrates that Smeaton designed the Eddystone Lighthouse by replicating Roman engineering plans.
  3. Delete it, because it interrupts the paragraph's focus on Smeaton's experimental process and the direct legacy of his lighthouse project.Cevap
  4. D
    Delete it, because it contradicts the earlier claim that Smeaton was the first engineer to develop a water-resistant mortar.

Cevap

Delete the sentence because it interrupts the paragraph's focus on Smeaton's experimental process and the direct legacy of his lighthouse project.
The sentence should be deleted because it introduces historical information about ancient Roman builders that is outside the scope of the paragraph. The paragraph is focused specifically on the 1756 project by John Smeaton to build the Eddystone Lighthouse and the legacy of his experiments. Mentioning the Roman Pantheon digresses from this narrative flow.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the main topic and focus of the paragraph.
The paragraph details British civil engineer John Smeaton's task of rebuilding the Eddystone Lighthouse in 1756, his challenge with standard mortar, his experiments, and his development of hydraulic mortar, which paved the way for modern cement.
Establishing the central theme is necessary to determine whether a sentence contributes to or detracts from paragraph unity.
2
Evaluate the function of the underlined sentence.
The underlined sentence states that Roman builders previously used a similar lime mixture to build the Pantheon.
Understanding the precise claim of the candidate sentence allows you to compare it to the overall narrative arc.
3
Determine if the sentence is relevant to the paragraph's focus.
The sentence introduces an digression about ancient Roman concrete. While it shares keywords like 'lime' and 'volcanic ash,' it shifts the historical timeline and narrative focus away from Smeaton's 18th-century experiments and legacy.
Evaluating logical relevance prevents the inclusion of off-topic information that merely shares surface-level vocabulary.
4
Select the option that correctly identifies the decision to delete and provides the correct rhetorical reason.
The correct option states that the sentence should be deleted because it interrupts the paragraph's focus on Smeaton's work and legacy.
Aligns the logical decision with the standard ACT writing goals of maintaining focus and cohesion.

Anahtar Kavram

Evaluating Relevance for Adding or Deleting Content
Bu soruyu puanla