Stepwells, known as *baoris* or *vavs* in western India, are subterranean architectural marvels constructed to harvest rainwater in arid regions. Descending multiple stories into the earth to reach the water table, these structures feature elaborate flights of stone steps and pillared pavilions designed to provide shade. [1] In addition to their practical function, stepwells served as vital social hubs and places of worship, particularly for women who gathered there daily to collect water.
The writer is considering adding the following sentence at Point [1]:
Rainwater harvesting is still practiced in many dry climates around the world today.
Should the writer make this addition?
- AYes, because it connects the historical use of stepwells to modern global environmental practices.
- BYes, because it supports the paragraph's claim that stepwells are the most efficient way to harvest water.
- No, because it shifts the focus of the paragraph from the specific history and function of Indian stepwells to a general statement about modern water conservation.Cevap
- DNo, because it does not specify which countries currently use rainwater harvesting systems.
Cevap
No, because it shifts the focus of the paragraph from the specific history and function of Indian stepwells to a general statement about modern water conservation.
The correct answer states that the sentence should not be added because it shifts the focus of the paragraph from the specific history and function of Indian stepwells to a general statement about modern water conservation. The paragraph is tightly focused on the historical, architectural, and cultural role of stepwells in India. Introducing a broad statement about global, contemporary water conservation disrupts this focus.
Adım Adım Çözüm
Anahtar Kavram
Evaluating Relevance for Adding or Deleting Content