Read the following passage and answer the question that follows:
In the early twentieth century, the chemist Ida Noddack published a paper proposing that the atomic nucleus could split into large fragments, a concept that anticipated the discovery of nuclear fission by several years. However, the physicist Lise Meitner dismissed the hypothesis as chemically impossible. Years later, when Meitner was celebrated for her own work on fission, she admitted that [she] had been correct all along.
Which of the following options best maintains clarity and grammatical correctness in the underlined portion of the passage?
- ANO CHANGE
- Bthis
- Cthey
- NoddackCevap
Cevap
The correct answer replaces the ambiguous pronoun with the specific proper noun 'Noddack' to clarify who was correct all along.
The correct option replaces the ambiguous pronoun with the specific noun 'Noddack'. In the context of the passage, the physicist Lise Meitner dismissed the hypothesis of nuclear fission proposed by the chemist Ida Noddack. Years later, Meitner admitted that Noddack had been correct all along. Using a pronoun here would create ambiguity because both scientists are female, and using a singular feminine pronoun would grammatically suggest that Meitner admitted that she herself had been correct, which is factually and logically incorrect.
Adım Adım Çözüm
Anahtar Kavram
Pronoun Clarity and Reference
Tahmini Süre:1m 0s