### Models of Martian Atmospheric Loss
Scientists agree that Mars once possessed a much thicker, warmer carbon dioxide () atmosphere than it does today. However, they disagree on the primary mechanism responsible for the loss of this atmosphere.
Model 1
Mars lost its atmosphere primarily through *solar wind stripping*. Early in its history, Mars had a liquid core that generated a strong global magnetic field, protecting the atmosphere. Approximately 4 billion years ago, the core cooled, and the magnetic field decayed. Without magnetic protection, high-energy particles from the solar wind directly struck the upper atmosphere. These particles transferred energy to gaseous molecules (primarily and ), accelerating them past Mars's escape velocity. This continuous stripping depleted the atmosphere over hundreds of millions of years.
Model 2
Mars lost its atmosphere primarily through *impact erosion* during the Late Heavy Bombardment, a period of intense asteroid and comet impacts between 4.1 and 3.8 billion years ago. When large impactors struck Mars, they produced massive vapor plumes that expanded faster than Mars's escape velocity, driving large portions of the overlying atmosphere into space. Because Mars has a relatively low gravitational acceleration (), these explosive impacts were highly efficient at ejecting gases. In contrast, the solar wind has a negligible long-term effect because the planet's gravity is strong enough to retain molecules energized solely by solar particles.
According to Model 1 and Model 2, which of the following statements describes a point of disagreement between the two models regarding the mechanism of atmospheric loss on Mars?
- AModel 1 proposes that atmospheric loss occurred primarily during the Late Heavy Bombardment, whereas Model 2 proposes that atmospheric loss occurred continuously after the decay of Mars's magnetic field.
- BModel 1 suggests that vapor plumes from asteroid impacts directly drove gases into space, whereas Model 2 suggests that gaseous molecules were stripped directly by solar particles.
- Model 1 asserts that high-energy solar wind particles drove atmospheric gases past escape velocity, whereas Model 2 asserts that solar wind particles had a negligible long-term effect on atmospheric depletion.Cevap
- DModel 1 claims that Mars's low gravity was the primary factor allowing solar wind particles to strip the atmosphere, whereas Model 2 claims that a liquid core protected the atmosphere during impacts.