[1] In 1956, Malcom McLean, a former trucking magnate, revolutionized global trade by introducing the standardized shipping container. [2] Before this innovation, cargo was loaded and unloaded piece by piece in a process known as break-bulk shipping, which was slow, labor-intensive, and prone to theft. [3] McLean's system allowed goods to be packed directly into large metal boxes that could be seamlessly transferred between trucks, trains, and ships. [4] Many early dockworkers belonged to powerful labor unions that negotiated wages and working conditions. [5] Consequently, the cost of loading cargo dropped from nearly six dollars a ton to just a few cents, facilitating a massive expansion of international commerce.
The writer is considering deleting Sentence 4 from the passage. Should this sentence be kept or deleted?
- AKept, because it provides historical context about the workforce that was affected by McLean's new shipping system.
- BKept, because it supports the paragraph's claim that break-bulk shipping was a slow and labor-intensive process.
- Deleted, because it introduces details about dockworkers' unions that interrupt the paragraph's discussion of the efficiency and cost-saving benefits of containerization.Cevap
- DDeleted, because it contradicts the assertion in Sentence 5 that containerization led to a massive expansion of international commerce.