Examkin

Soru

Zorluk: Çok zorEvaluating Supporting Evidence

For decades, paleoanthropologists debated whether Neanderthals possessed the capacity for symbolic thought, a trait long considered unique to modern *Homo sapiens*. The discovery of red ochre at Neanderthal sites dating back 250,000 years was initially heralded as definitive evidence of symbolic behavior, such as body painting or ritual burial. However, skeptics argued that ochre's presence could be explained by utilitarian functions, noting its efficacy as an adhesive for hafting tools or as a hide-preservative. To evaluate these competing claims, researchers recently analyzed the specific physical properties of ochre remnants from the Maastricht-Belvédère site in the Netherlands. They found that the ochre was consistently processed into a fine powder and mixed with liquid to form a paste, a preparation unnecessary for simple tool hafting but essential for application as a pigment. Furthermore, trace analysis of the associated tool assemblages revealed no residues of the ochre on hafted implements, while microscopic wear patterns on the ochre-processing stones indicated they were used exclusively for grinding soft materials rather than crushing hard mineral aggregates. This distinction suggests that the ochre was prepared for purposes unrelated to mechanical tool assembly, lending support to the hypothesis that Neanderthals engaged in non-utilitarian, symbolic activities.

According to the passage, which of the following findings from the Maastricht-Belvédère site provides the most direct evidence supporting the claim that the processed ochre was not used for tool hafting?

  1. A
    The widespread presence of red ochre across Neanderthal habitation sites dating back 250,000 years
  2. B
    The microscopic wear patterns indicating that the processing stones were used to crush hard mineral aggregates
  3. The absence of ochre residues on the hafted portions of the tools in the site's assemblagesCevap
  4. D
    The suitability of ochre paste for preserving animal hides and adhering stone points to shafts

Cevap

The absence of ochre residues on the hafted portions of the tools in the site's assemblages
The correct answer is the finding that no ochre residues were present on the hafted tools. The author argues that the processed ochre at the Maastricht-Belvédère site was prepared for non-utilitarian, symbolic purposes rather than tool hafting. The lack of residues on the hafted portions of the tools from the site's tool assemblages directly supports this claim by showing that the ochre paste was not applied to the tools during assembly, ruling out tool hafting as the explanation for the ochre's presence.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the author's target claim in the passage.
The target claim is that the red ochre processed at the Maastricht-Belvédère site was prepared for purposes unrelated to mechanical tool assembly (specifically tool hafting).
This establishes what specific claim the supporting evidence must justify.
2
Scan the passage for archaeological findings directly related to tool hafting at the Maastricht-Belvédère site.
The passage notes that trace analysis of the tool assemblages revealed no residues of the ochre on hafted implements.
This finding directly links the physical evidence at the site to the absence of the proposed utilitarian hafting function.
3
Evaluate the options to find the one that matches this finding and directly supports the claim.
The option identifying the absence of ochre residues on the hafted portions of the tools provides direct support, as it physically demonstrates that the ochre was not used for hafting on the site's tools.
This confirms the correct option while eliminating choices that are either factually incorrect, represent the skeptics' counter-claims, or refer to broader context rather than specific evidence.

Anahtar Kavram

Evaluating Supporting Evidence
Tahmini Süre:2m 0s
Bu soruyu puanla

Konular

Evaluating Supporting Evidence

Bu konudan daha fazla soru