A writer is editing a passage about the Wright brothers' early aviation experiments and has drafted the following paragraph:
In the autumn of 1901, Wilbur and Orville Wright realized that existing aerodynamic data was highly inaccurate, threatening to stall their aviation experiments. To resolve this, they constructed a wind tunnel in their bicycle shop. [1] The tunnel was a simple wooden box, six feet long and sixteen inches square, equipped with a fan driven by a two-horsepower gasoline engine. Inside, they tested sheet-metal lift balances, which they fabricated out of bicycle spokes and scrap metal. Through these rigorous trials, they collected the precise data necessary to design their successful 1902 glider.
The writer is considering adding the following sentence at Point [1]:
'The brothers also sold and repaired bicycles to fund their aviation research.'
Should the writer make this addition at Point [1]?
- AYes, because it explains how the brothers obtained the materials, such as bicycle spokes, that they used to build the lift balances.
- BYes, because it provides essential context regarding the financial challenges the Wright brothers faced during their early research.
- No, because it interrupts the paragraph's description of the wind tunnel's construction and testing with unrelated information about their business.Cevap
- DNo, because it repeats information about the bicycle shop that is already established in the preceding sentence.