Examkin

Soru

Zorluk: OrtaEvaluating Relevance for Adding or Deleting Content

A writer is editing an essay about early bridge engineering and has drafted the following paragraph:

James Finley, a judge in Pennsylvania, revolutionized transportation in 18011801 by building the first modern suspension bridge. Finley utilized iron chains to support a level wooden deck, allowing heavy carriages to cross Jacob's Creek safely. Prior to Finley's design, suspension bridges were constructed from rope or vines, which dipped significantly in the center and were highly unstable in strong winds. Finley patented his design in 18081808, and he went on to write several influential pamphlets describing the structural engineering principles behind his bridge.

Should the writer keep or delete the underlined sentence?

  1. Keep it, because it establishes the historical context that highlights the significance of Finley's structural innovation.Cevap
  2. B
    Keep it, because it details the geographical regions where rope and vine bridges were traditionally built.
  3. C
    Delete it, because it shifts the focus from Finley's engineering contributions to ancient bridge-building materials.
  4. D
    Delete it, because it repeats information about transport safety that is mentioned earlier in the paragraph.

Cevap

Keep it, because it establishes the historical context that highlights the significance of Finley's structural innovation.
The correct option states that the sentence should be kept because it establishes the historical context that highlights the significance of Finley's structural innovation. The paragraph focuses on Finley's revolutionary bridge design, and contrasting it with the instability of prior designs helps the reader appreciate the importance of his invention.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the main focus of the paragraph.
The paragraph describes James Finley's development of the modern suspension bridge, focusing on its design innovations.
Understanding the paragraph's theme is necessary to evaluate the relevance of the sentence in question.
2
Analyze the function of the underlined sentence within the paragraph.
The sentence explains that prior bridges made of rope or vines were unstable and dipped, which contrasts with Finley's level and safe design.
This determines if the sentence contributes to the focus of the paragraph or introduces an irrelevant digression.
3
Evaluate the decision and choose the correct justification.
The sentence should be kept to provide historical context. The option containing 'Keep it' and mentioning 'historical context' is selected.
Only one option correctly identifies both the correct decision (keep) and the logical rhetorical purpose.

Anahtar Kavram

Evaluating the relevance of supporting details by assessing whether they contribute to the main topic of a paragraph or create an irrelevant shift in focus.
Bu soruyu puanla

Konular

Evaluating Relevance for Adding or Deleting Content

Bu konudan daha fazla soru