Soru

Zorluk: OrtaSentence Addition and Deletion Decisions

[1] In 1998, an anonymous collector purchased a damaged medieval prayer book at auction for two million dollars, initiating one of the most complex projects in modern conservation. [2] The book was a palimpsest—a manuscript whose original text had been scraped away to reuse the parchment. [3] Beneath the thirteenth-century prayers lay the only surviving copies of several treatises by the ancient Greek mathematician Archimedes. [4] Conservationists immediately began a decade-long effort to separate the bound pages and read the erased writing. [5] Archimedes is widely regarded as one of the leading scientists of classical antiquity, alongside figures like Euclid and Eratosthenes. [6] Ultimately, by utilizing multispectral imaging and X-ray fluorescence, the team successfully recovered the hidden mathematical texts.

The writer is considering deleting Sentence 5 from the passage. Should this sentence be kept or deleted?

  1. A
    Kept, because it provides essential biographical context that explains Archimedes's historical significance to the reader.
  2. B
    Kept, because it establishes the connection between the mathematical treatises mentioned in Sentence 3 and the conservation techniques discussed in Sentence 6.
  3. Deleted, because it interrupts the paragraph's focus on the conservation and recovery of the Archimedes Palimpsest with tangential biographical information.Cevap
  4. D
    Deleted, because it repeats details about Archimedes's mathematical works that are already stated in Sentence 3.

Cevap

Deleted, because it interrupts the paragraph's focus on the conservation and recovery of the Archimedes Palimpsest with tangential biographical information.
The correct option is the one stating that the sentence should be deleted because it interrupts the paragraph's focus on the conservation and recovery of the Archimedes Palimpsest. The paragraph is strictly about the physical work and technical methods used to salvage the manuscript; introducing details about Euclid, Eratosthenes, and Archimedes's general standing in classical antiquity distracts from this unified theme.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Determine the primary focus of the paragraph.
The paragraph describes the discovery, physical nature, and technical recovery of the Archimedes Palimpsest manuscript.
Understanding the paragraph's main theme is necessary to evaluate the relevance of the sentence in question.
2
Analyze the content of the sentence proposed for deletion.
Sentence 5 offers broad biographical context, comparing Archimedes to other ancient scientists.
This determines whether the sentence contributes to the main narrative or introduces off-topic material.
3
Evaluate the options to match the correct reasoning.
The sentence should be deleted because it breaks the narrative flow regarding manuscript conservation by shifting focus to general history.
A deletion choice must be paired with an accurate justification of why the sentence is not relevant to the specific context.

Anahtar Kavram

Evaluating relevance to maintain paragraph unity and cohesion
Bu soruyu puanla