Soru

Zorluk: ZorEvaluating Relevance for Adding or Deleting Content

During the Space Race of the mid-twentieth century, NASA relied on a group of female mathematicians known as 'human computers' to calculate complex flight trajectories. Among them was Katherine Johnson, whose exceptional mathematical skills were critical to the success of early crewed space missions. In 1962, as John Glenn prepared for the Friendship 7 mission, he famously requested that Johnson personally verify the orbital calculations programmed into NASA's new electronic computers. The electronic computers were mainframe IBM 7090 models, which occupied an entire room and used vacuum tubes before being upgraded to transistors. Although these electronic machines were incredibly fast, Glenn was skeptical of their reliability and trusted Johnson’s calculations more. Johnson’s work on this mission not only proved the capability of human computers but also helped transition NASA into the digital age.

The writer is considering deleting the underlined sentence from the paragraph. Should the sentence be kept or deleted?

  1. A
    Kept, because it provides essential technical context that explains why Glenn was skeptical of the reliability of the electronic computers.
  2. B
    Kept, because it supports the paragraph's main theme by showing how advanced NASA's technology was compared to human computers.
  3. Deleted, because it interrupts the paragraph's focus on Glenn's reliance on Johnson's calculations by introducing irrelevant technical details about the computers.Cevap
  4. D
    Deleted, because it contradicts the assertion made later in the paragraph that Glenn trusted Johnson's calculations more than the electronic machines.

Cevap

Deleted, because it interrupts the paragraph's focus on Glenn's reliance on Johnson's calculations by introducing irrelevant technical details about the computers.
The correct decision is to delete the sentence. The paragraph focuses on Glenn's reliance on Johnson's calculations rather than on the electronic computers. Introducing technical specifications of the computers interrupts this narrative flow with irrelevant hardware details. The option proposing deletion for this reason is correct.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the primary topic and focus of the paragraph.
The paragraph details Katherine Johnson's role as a human computer and John Glenn's preference for her verification over electronic computers during a critical space mission.
Determining the main narrative thread is necessary to judge the relevance of individual sentences.
2
Analyze the function of the underlined sentence within the paragraph.
The sentence provides descriptive hardware details (IBM 7090, vacuum tubes, transistors) about NASA's computers.
This helps determine whether the sentence directly supports the story of human calculations versus computer skepticism.
3
Decide if the sentence should be kept or deleted, matching it with the correct justification.
The hardware details are tangential and break the connection between Glenn requesting verification and his reasoning for doing so. Thus, the sentence should be deleted.
Removing off-topic information preserves paragraph unity and maintains the focus on the main subject.

Anahtar Kavram

Evaluating whether a sentence adds relevant support or introduces a distraction that disrupts the paragraph's focus.
Tahmini Süre:1m 15s
Bu soruyu puanla