While visiting New York City in the winter of 1903, Mary Anderson noticed that streetcar drivers had to open their windows in the freezing rain to clear sleet from their windshields. She sketched a design for a hand-operated swinging arm with a rubber blade that could be controlled from inside the cabin. She was granted a patent for her device later that year, though manufacturing companies initially showed little interest. Today, windshield wipers are standard equipment on almost all motorized vehicles.
The writer is considering adding the following sentence to the end of the paragraph:
'During her trip to New York, Anderson also visited several popular art museums and historical landmarks.'
Should the writer make this addition?
- AYes, because it provides important details about why Anderson was visiting New York City.
- BYes, because it highlights other achievements and activities in Anderson's life.
- No, because it deviates from the paragraph's focus on Anderson's invention of the windshield wiper.Cevap
- DNo, because it contradicts the paragraph's earlier statement that Anderson was in New York during the winter.
Cevap
No, because it deviates from the paragraph's focus on Anderson's invention of the windshield wiper.
The paragraph focuses on Mary Anderson's invention of the windshield wiper, tracking the process from her observation of the problem to the patent and its modern use. The proposed sentence about visiting art museums and historical landmarks is irrelevant to this central focus, so it should not be added.
Adım Adım Çözüm
Anahtar Kavram
Evaluating Relevance for Adding or Deleting Content