Soru

Zorluk: OrtaComprehending Explicit Comparisons and Contrasts

The following passage is adapted from an essay on historical keyboard instruments.

While both the harpsichord and the clavichord were popular keyboard instruments during the Baroque period, their mechanical designs and acoustic properties differed significantly. In a harpsichord, pressing a key activates a vertical jack that plucks the tensioned string with a small quill. This action produces a bright, uniform volume, meaning the sound's intensity remains consistent regardless of how forcefully the player strikes the key. In contrast, the clavichord features a small metal blade, called a tangent, that strikes the string and remains in direct contact with it as long as the key is held down. This continuous physical connection allows the clavichordist to control the volume dynamically through finger pressure and even perform vibrato—a subtle, expressive variation in pitch. However, because the clavichord's overall sound is exceptionally quiet, its use was historically confined to intimate, private rooms, whereas the harpsichord's louder, carrying tone made it suitable for larger public performances.

Based on the passage, which of the following statements explicitly describes a contrast in how sound was produced by the two instruments?

  1. The clavichord produced sound through a tangent that struck and remained in contact with the string, whereas the harpsichord relied on a jack that plucked the string.Cevap
  2. B
    The clavichord relied on a jack to pluck the string, whereas the harpsichord used a tangent to strike the string.
  3. C
    The clavichord produced a loud, carrying tone suitable for public performances, whereas the harpsichord produced a quiet sound confined to intimate rooms.
  4. D
    The clavichord was limited to a single, uniform volume, whereas the harpsichord permitted dynamic volume control through variation in key pressure.

Cevap

The clavichord produced sound through a tangent that struck and remained in contact with the string, whereas the harpsichord relied on a jack that plucked the string.
The correct answer accurately states the mechanical differences between the two instruments: the clavichord uses a tangent that strikes and stays in contact with the string, while the harpsichord uses a jack that plucks the string. This directly aligns with the literal details in the text.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Locate the description of sound production for the harpsichord in the text.
The text states that in a harpsichord, a vertical jack plucks the string with a quill.
To establish the baseline mechanism of the first instrument being compared.
2
Locate the description of sound production for the clavichord in the text.
The text states that the clavichord has a tangent that strikes the string and remains in direct contact.
To establish the baseline mechanism of the second instrument being compared.
3
Compare these two literal statements against the options to find the correct contrast.
The option stating the clavichord struck and held the string with a tangent while the harpsichord plucked it with a jack accurately reflects the explicit comparison.
To verify which statement accurately captures the direct differences without distorting details.

Anahtar Kavram

Comprehending Explicit Comparisons and Contrasts
Bu soruyu puanla