Many urban planners advocate for the expansion of public transit systems, arguing that buses and trains are the most efficient way to reduce city traffic congestion. Opponents of these projects, however, point out that building new transit lines requires high initial tax investments and years of disruptive construction. In response, supporters of public transit emphasize that the long-term economic benefits, such as reduced road maintenance and increased property values near stations, far outweigh the temporary costs of construction.
Based on the passage, how do supporters of public transit respond to the opponents' concern that public transit projects are too costly and disruptive?
- ABy arguing that transit projects should be avoided because their primary effect is disruptive construction.
- BBy claiming that the government will completely eliminate road maintenance costs during construction.
- By arguing that the long-term economic benefits of transit expansion will outweigh the temporary costs.Cevap
- DBy stating that buses and trains are the most efficient way to reduce traffic congestion.
Cevap
By arguing that the long-term economic benefits of transit expansion will outweigh the temporary costs.
The correct answer is supported by the final sentence of the passage, which explicitly states that in response to opponents' concerns about high costs and construction disruption, supporters emphasize that the long-term economic benefits far outweigh the temporary costs of construction.
Adım Adım Çözüm
Anahtar Kavram
Analyzing Counterarguments and Opposing Viewpoints