When paleontologist John Ostrom presented his reconstruction of *Deinonychus* in 1969, he was not merely describing a newly discovered raptor; he was delivering a polite but firm challenge to the foundational tenets of dinosaur physiology. For nearly a century, the prevailing scientific consensus had cast dinosaurs as sluggish, dim-witted, cold-blooded reptiles—evolutionary dead ends lumbering through ancient swamps. Ostrom’s description of *Deinonychus* as an agile, warm-blooded predator that hunted in packs was met with immediate skepticism. Traditionalists clung to the established reptilian paradigm, viewing his assertions as sensationalist speculation. Yet, Ostrom did not meet this resistance with defensive hostility. Instead, he systematically dismantled objections with a wealth of anatomical evidence, focusing on the structural similarities between *Deinonychus* and modern birds. His tone in these early papers was one of rigorous composure: he treated his detractors' doubts not as personal attacks, but as logical hurdles that could be cleared through empirical proof.
According to the passage, how does the author characterize John Ostrom's attitude toward the scientific skepticism his theories faced?
- Acombative and dismissive of traditional views.
- patient and grounded in scientific rigor.Cevap
- Canxious and eager to avoid professional conflict.
- Dindifferent to the opinions of his peers.