Soru

Zorluk: OrtaEvaluating Relevance for Adding or Deleting Content

In the early nineteenth century, timekeeping in the United States was a purely local affair. Every town set its own clocks based on the sun's position at midday, creating a confusing patchwork of hundreds of local times across the country. This system was manageable when travel was slow, but the rapid expansion of railroads after the Civil War made scheduling train routes and avoiding collisions nearly impossible. To solve this crisis, major railroad companies agreed to establish four standardized time zones across the continental United States in November 1883. Although the federal government did not officially adopt these zones until the passage of the Standard Time Act in 1918, the public quickly embraced the railroad-devised system, realizing its convenience for daily commerce and travel.

The writer is considering adding the following sentence to the paragraph (placed after the sentence ending with the word 'impossible'):

'At the time, railroad tracks were made of durable steel rather than iron, allowing for heavier trains and faster travel.'

Should the writer make this addition?

  1. A
    Yes, because it provides necessary background information about the technological advancements of the railroad industry during the nineteenth century.
  2. B
    Yes, because it supports the paragraph's discussion of why railroad scheduling was so complicated and dangerous.
  3. No, because it interrupts the paragraph's focus on the development of standardized time by introducing an unrelated detail about railroad construction materials.Cevap
  4. D
    No, because it contradicts the paragraph's assertion that the expansion of railroads made scheduling more difficult.

Cevap

The option stating that the writer should not add the sentence because it interrupts the focus on standardized time by introducing details about railroad materials.
The paragraph focuses on the development of standardized time zones in the United States and how they resolved scheduling conflicts caused by local timekeeping. The proposed sentence discusses railroad track materials (steel instead of iron) and its effect on train speed and weight. While this information is related to railroads, it is irrelevant to the central theme of timekeeping and standardized time. Therefore, the sentence should not be added because it introduces an unrelated detail that interrupts the paragraph's primary focus.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the primary topic and focus of the paragraph.
The paragraph describes the transition from confusing local timekeeping systems in the United States to standardized time zones, driven by the scheduling needs of expanding railroads.
Understanding the paragraph's core focus is necessary to determine if new information is relevant.
2
Analyze the proposed sentence to determine its main subject.
The proposed sentence details the shift from iron to steel tracks and how this allowed for heavier and faster trains.
This helps identify whether the sentence contributes to the theme of time standardization or introduces an unrelated topic.
3
Compare the proposed sentence to the paragraph's focus and evaluate the choice.
The proposed sentence is about railroad construction materials, which does not support the topic of time standardization. Therefore, the sentence should not be added because it is irrelevant and interrupts the logical flow.
This leads directly to the correct decision and explanation.

Anahtar Kavram

Evaluating Relevance for Adding or Deleting Content
Tahmini Süre:1m 0s
Bu soruyu puanla