Examkin

Soru

Zorluk: KolayEvaluating Narrator Reliability and Bias

Read the following passage:

I was paired with Julian for the biology poster project, which was unfortunate because everyone knows Julian is entirely unreliable. From the very beginning, I had to take charge of the entire operation. I spent hours at the library selecting the most colorful diagram of the human respiratory system and purchasing the perfect tri-fold board. Julian, on the other hand, barely contributed anything of value. All he did was sit in the corner typing on his laptop, occasionally showing me paragraphs of text about cellular respiration that he claimed were "essential scientific background." When it came time to present, our teacher, Mrs. Gable, gave us an A, specifically praising the depth of the written explanations and the accuracy of the citations. Naturally, I accepted the compliment on behalf of our team, glad that my leadership had saved our grade from Julian’s lazy habits.

Based on the passage, which of the following statements best explains why the narrator's evaluation of Julian's contribution is unreliable?

  1. A
    The teacher gave the team an A because the narrator spent hours at the library selecting the diagram.
  2. B
    The narrator is reliable because Julian admitted that cellular respiration was merely background information.
  3. The narrator claims Julian contributed nothing of value, even though the teacher praised the written explanations that Julian wrote.Cevap
  4. D
    The narrator dislikes Julian because Julian refused to do any work on the computer.

Cevap

The narrator claims Julian contributed nothing of value, even though the teacher praised the written explanations that Julian wrote.
The correct option is supported by the direct contradiction between the narrator's personal feelings and the objective outcome. The narrator insists that Julian's work was useless, yet the teacher specifically singles out the written sections (which Julian drafted on his laptop) as the reason for the top grade. This discrepancy highlights the narrator's self-serving bias.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the narrator's claim about Julian's participation.
The narrator claims Julian did not contribute anything useful and was lazy.
To establish the narrator's point of view regarding Julian.
2
Identify what Julian actually did during the project.
Julian sat typing on his laptop, producing paragraphs of scientific explanations and citations.
To gather facts about Julian's actual actions in the narrative.
3
Examine the teacher's evaluation of the project.
The teacher gave the team an A, specifically praising the written explanations and citations.
To find objective external feedback on the quality of the project's components.
4
Compare the narrator's claim with the teacher's evaluation.
The narrator's dismissive claims are contradicted by the fact that Julian's written work was the primary reason they received an A. This contradiction shows the narrator's bias and unreliability.
To determine why the narrator's perspective cannot be fully trusted.

Anahtar Kavram

Evaluating Narrator Reliability and Bias
Bu soruyu puanla

Konular

Evaluating Narrator Reliability and Bias

Bu konudan daha fazla soru