Soru

Zorluk: ZorSequence of Events

When Dr. Sandra Chen first documented the anomalous growth patterns in the ancient cedars of the Pacific Northwest, she was a newly minted graduate student in 1998, focused on climate variability. It was not until six years later, while comparing her dendrochronological data with historical Japanese harbor logs from the Edo period, that the chronological puzzle of the Cascadia subduction zone began to resolve. The Japanese records described an unexplained 'orphan tsunami' that had devastated coastal villages, a mystery that had long puzzled historians because no local earthquake had preceded it. Chen realized that the cedar rings showed a sudden growth halt in the spring of 1700, aligning precisely with the January 1700 harbor logs. Although her synthesis offered an elegant explanation, her colleagues initially greeted the hypothesis with profound skepticism. This academic resistance persisted until 2012, when marine geologist Kenji Sato retrieved deep-sea sediment cores that confirmed massive underwater landslides dating to that exact winter, providing the physical evidence needed to validate Chen’s timeline.

According to the passage, which of the following events occurred after Chen compared her tree-ring data with historical Japanese records but before Sato gathered deep-sea sediment cores?

  1. Chen's colleagues expressed widespread skepticism regarding her proposed timeline.Cevap
  2. B
    Chen first documented the unusual growth patterns in the old-growth cedars.
  3. C
    Sato retrieved deep-sea sediment cores confirming submarine landslides.
  4. D
    Japanese harbor logs recorded the arrival of an unexplained tsunami.

Cevap

Chen's colleagues expressing skepticism about her hypothesis occurred in the period between her 2004 data comparison and Sato's 2012 core collection.
According to the passage, Chen conducted her comparative analysis in 2004 (six years after she began her graduate studies in 1998). The passage notes that after this, her hypothesis was greeted with skepticism that persisted until Sato retrieved sediment cores in 2012. Therefore, the widespread skepticism of her colleagues is the event that occurred between these two milestones.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the timeframe of the first reference event.
Chen compared her dendrochronological data with Japanese logs six years after 1998, which is 2004.
This establishes the start of the temporal window in question.
2
Identify the timeframe of the second reference event.
Sato retrieved deep-sea sediment cores in 2012.
This establishes the end of the temporal window in question.
3
Evaluate the chronology of the options to find which falls between 2004 and 2012.
The academic resistance and skepticism toward Chen's hypothesis occurred after 2004 and lasted until Sato's discovery in 2012.
This matches the target interval perfectly.

Anahtar Kavram

Chronological Sequencing in Non-Linear Texts
Bu soruyu puanla