The paragraph below contains an underlined portion in brackets.
In 1964, radio astronomers Arno Penzias and Robert Wilson detected a persistent background noise that they could not explain. This mysterious [hum, later identified as the cosmic microwave background radiation, the thermal echo of the Big Bang—was] coming from all directions in the sky. To rule out local interference, they even cleaned the horn antenna of pigeon droppings, but the signal remained.
Which of the following options is the correct punctuation for the underlined portion in brackets?
- ANO CHANGE
- hum—later identified as the cosmic microwave background radiation, the thermal echo of the Big Bang—wasCevap
- Chum—later identified as the cosmic microwave background radiation, the thermal echo of the Big Bang; was
- Dhum: later identified as the cosmic microwave background radiation, the thermal echo of the Big Bang, was
Cevap
The option that uses consistent dashes ('hum—later identified as the cosmic microwave background radiation, the thermal echo of the Big Bang—was') is correct.
A pair of dashes is used to set off non-essential parenthetical information. In this sentence, the phrase beginning with 'later identified' and ending with 'Big Bang' is non-essential and contains internal commas. To set this phrase off cleanly and consistently, matching dashes must be used at both the beginning and the end of the phrase.
Adım Adım Çözüm
Anahtar Kavram
Using matching punctuation (such as a pair of dashes) to consistently set off parenthetical or non-essential information within a sentence.