Read the passage below:
For three weeks, the studio had smelled of linseed oil and turf smoke, a workspace where I labored to capture the elusive contour of the judge’s mouth. My brush hovered, searching for the line where sternness yielded to fatigue. Surely, a man who had sent dozens to the gallows possessed some hidden reservoir of regret, and I was determined to find it. I watched his eyes, hoping for a flicker of vulnerability, a momentary lapse in his severe composure that I could translate into paint.
But the judge himself sat perfectly still, his mind elsewhere. He was not thinking of the portraitist, nor of the damp Dublin afternoon pressing against the windowpane. Instead, his thoughts drifted back to the dry summer of 1882, to the dusty road outside Pretoria where he had made a decision he could never undo. The courtroom had always been a theater of distant facts, but that road was a vivid, burning reality. He could still feel the grit in his throat and hear the quiet plea of the accused man. The paint on the canvas would dry, the likeness would be hung, but the judge knew that no oil could cover the color of that particular dust.
Which of the following best describes the shift in narrative perspective that occurs between the first and second paragraphs?
- Aa third-person limited view of the artist's anxiety to an omniscient narrator's objective account of the Dublin courtroom.
- Ba first-person account of an artist’s creative process to a first-person reflection by the judge on his past decisions.
- a first-person perspective of an artist observing a subject to a third-person limited perspective exploring the subject’s internal memories.Cevap
- Da third-person omniscient description of a studio setting to a first-person monologue by the judge.