Soru

Zorluk: OrtaSupporting Claims with Evidence and Details

Passage

In the early twentieth century, astronomer Henrietta Swan Leavitt made a groundbreaking discovery while analyzing photographic plates at the Harvard College Observatory. By studying Cepheid variable stars, she established that a star’s intrinsic luminosity is directly related to the period of its pulsations. This relationship became a vital tool, enabling astronomers to calculate the distance to far-off galaxies. Indeed, Edwin Hubble used Leavitt’s law to determine the distance to the Andromeda Nebula, showing that it lay far outside our own galaxy.

Given that all the choices are true, the writer wants to revise the bolded sentence to provide the most specific, concrete details that support the claim that Leavitt's discovery was essential in measuring the vast scale of the universe. Which choice best accomplishes this goal?

  1. A
    Indeed, Leavitt's discovery earned her wide acclaim from peers, and Magnus Gösta Mittag-Leffler even considered nominating her for a Nobel Prize in 1924, though she had unfortunately passed away by then.
  2. Indeed, Edwin Hubble used Leavitt's law to calculate that the Andromeda Nebula was 2.5 million light-years away, proving it was a separate galaxy rather than a local cloud of gas.Cevap
  3. C
    Indeed, Edwin Hubble used Leavitt's law to show that another galaxy was located extremely far away from the Milky Way.
  4. D
    Indeed, Edwin Hubble used Leavitt's law to determine that Andromeda was a separate galaxy; which lay millions of light-years beyond our own Milky Way.

Cevap

Indeed, Edwin Hubble used Leavitt's law to calculate that the Andromeda Nebula was 2.5 million light-years away, proving it was a separate galaxy rather than a local cloud of gas.
The correct choice successfully meets the rhetorical goal by providing highly specific, concrete details—such as the precise distance of '2.5 million light-years away' and the impact of 'proving it was a separate galaxy rather than a local cloud of gas'—which directly support the claim about measuring the scale of the universe.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the prompt's rhetorical goal.
The goal is to find the option that provides the most specific, concrete details supporting the claim that Leavitt's discovery helped measure the vast scale of the universe.
This establishes the criteria for evaluating the choices.
2
Evaluate the choices against the goal and look for factual relevance and level of detail.
The option about the Nobel Prize nomination is about professional recognition, not cosmic distance. The option about 'extremely far away' is too vague. The option with '2.5 million light-years away' provides specific, quantitative, concrete data.
This filters out irrelevant or overly generalized choices.
3
Check the remaining candidates for grammatical accuracy.
The option containing the semicolon before 'which lay' is grammatically incorrect, leaving only the option with the concrete measurement of 2.5 million light-years as both grammatically correct and rhetorically optimal.
This ensures the final selection meets both rhetorical goals and standard grammatical rules.

Anahtar Kavram

Supporting Claims with Evidence and Details
Bu soruyu puanla