Read the following passage:
"In the rush to document the vanishing architectural monuments of the late industrial era, preservationists have frequently overlooked a more transient casualty of modernity: the historical soundscape. The rhythmic clack of water-powered looms, the metallic clangor of early steam hammers, the singular cry of street vendors selling coal—these were not mere background noise, but the primary auditory architecture that structured the daily consciousness of nineteenth-century laborers. Acoustic ecologists argue that to analyze a past era solely through its material remnants is to study a silent film with the projector bulb turned off. Yet, reconstructing these acoustic environments is fraught with methodological perils. Standard archival sources are notoriously mute on the subject of decibels and frequencies, offering at best subjective, literary descriptions of noise that are heavily filtered through the class biases of middle-class observers who viewed the din of the working districts with pathologizing alarm. Consequently, the researcher must treat historical text not as a transparent window into past sounds, but as a rhetorical screen, parsing the emotional charge of adjectives to reconstruct the acoustic reality hidden beneath the writer’s disapproval."
Which of the following best characterizes the author’s rhetorical perspective and style in the passage?
- AAn activist calling for the immediate acoustic preservation of remaining industrial sites, using passionate and urgent language to highlight the negligence of traditional preservationists.
- An advocate for a neglected field of historical inquiry who maintains a scholarly vigilance regarding the limitations of its primary source materials.Cevap
- CA detached historian who rejects literary archives as useless for reconstructing historical soundscapes due to the inherent biases of middle-class observers.
- DA cultural critic who champions the working-class perspective by condemning nineteenth-century middle-class observers for their deliberate silencing of industrial history.