Soru

Zorluk: ZorIdentifying Narrator Point of View

We had been in the valley for three weeks before Dr. Aris spoke of the map. Up to that point, my duties had consisted entirely of carrying the brass theodolite and ensuring the inkwells did not dry out in the mountain wind. To the newspapers in the capital, Dr. Aris was a visionary expanding the empire’s borders, but to me, he was a silent, plodding presence whose primary interest seemed to be the exact distribution of high-altitude lichen rather than the expansion of territory.

When he finally unrolled the vellum map on the camp table, he did not point to the new roads or the proposed railway line. Instead, his finger traced a series of faint, pencil-marked contours along the eastern ridge. 'The cartographers in the ministry think a mountain is a static obstacle,' he muttered, more to himself than to me. 'They draw their straight lines and expect the world to conform. But look at this gap. The water knows the path of least resistance, and so do the traders. A map that ignores the path of least resistance is merely a piece of propaganda.'

I watched his weathered hand rest on the paper. In that moment, I realized that Dr. Aris did not share the grand, imperial ambitions of his patrons. For him, the survey was not an act of conquest, but a quiet conversation with the landscape. While the ministry back home celebrated his progress as a triumph of national will, Dr. Aris seemed to view our expedition as a way to escape the very civilization we were tasked with extending. I wrote down his observations in the logbook, feeling a strange complicity in his silent rebellion against the state that paid our salaries.

Based on the passage, the narrator is best described as which of the following?

  1. an assistant who observes and sympathizes with the lead surveyor's quiet divergence from the state's imperial goalsCevap
  2. B
    an author who utilizes the narrative to directly voice personal opposition to the ministry's expansionist policies
  3. C
    a loyal government employee who becomes increasingly critical of the surveyor's neglect of his mapping duties
  4. D
    a detached third-person observer who documents the expedition's progress with scientific neutrality

Cevap

an assistant who observes and sympathizes with the lead surveyor's quiet divergence from the state's imperial goals
The correct answer correctly identifies the narrator as a first-person assistant participating in the expedition who recognizes and sympathizes with the lead surveyor's quiet divergence from the state's imperial goals. The narrator's descriptions of Dr. Aris and their shared work emphasize a quiet alignment and a sense of shared, silent rebellion.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the narrative voice of the passage.
The passage uses first-person pronouns ('my duties,' 'I watched,' 'I wrote') to establish a first-person narrator who acts as an assistant to Dr. Aris.
Determining the narrator's point of view requires identifying whether the narrator is a character within the story or an outside voice.
2
Analyze the narrator's relationship to Dr. Aris and the expedition.
The narrator recognizes that Dr. Aris's scientific interests and thoughts ('quiet conversation with the landscape') conflict with the imperial goals of the ministry. The narrator explicitly feels a 'strange complicity' with this rebellion.
This establishes the narrator's subjective perspective and emotional connection to the subject matter.
3
Match the analyzed perspective to the options and eliminate distractors.
The option stating that the narrator is an assistant who sympathizes with the surveyor's divergence matches this analysis. The other options either confuse the narrator with the author, misinterpret the narrator's tone as critical, or misidentify the point of view as detached third-person.
This step ensures the selected option is the only one fully supported by the text.

Anahtar Kavram

Identifying Narrator Point of View
Tahmini Süre:2m 0s
Bu soruyu puanla