Tüm alıştırma soruları

5556 soru

Soru 681Soru

While exploring deep-sea hydrothermal vents, astrobiologists identified several unstable, vibrant, complex, organic, compounds, and they hypothesized that these chemicals could support microbial life.

Which of the following choices best punctuates the underlined portion of the sentence?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: unstable, vibrant, complex organic compounds, and they

Cevap

The choice that correctly punctuates the coordinate adjectives with commas, leaves the cumulative adjective and noun unseparated, and uses a comma before the coordinating conjunction to join the two independent clauses.
The correct choice properly separates the coordinate adjectives 'unstable', 'vibrant', and 'complex' with commas, while correctly omitting a comma before the cumulative adjective 'organic' and the noun 'compounds'. It also places a comma before the coordinating conjunction 'and' to separate the two independent clauses.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Determine if the adjectives modifying the noun are coordinate or cumulative.
The adjectives 'unstable', 'vibrant', and 'complex' can be reordered and separated by 'and' without changing the meaning of the sentence, so they are coordinate adjectives and require commas between them. However, 'organic' is a cumulative adjective that functions as a single unit with the noun 'compounds' ('organic compounds'), so no comma should separate 'complex' from 'organic', nor should a comma separate 'organic' from 'compounds'.
Correctly applying adjective comma rules prevents punctuation errors in descriptive sequences.
2
Identify the clause boundary and determine the correct punctuation to link them.
The sentence consists of two independent clauses: the first ends with 'compounds' and the second begins with 'they hypothesized'. These clauses are connected by the coordinating conjunction 'and', which must be preceded by a comma.
Joining two independent clauses with a coordinating conjunction requires a comma before the conjunction to avoid comma splices or run-on sentences.
3
Combine the adjective punctuation and clause punctuation to evaluate the options.
The correct combination is 'unstable, vibrant, complex organic compounds, and they'.
This option properly formats both the coordinate/cumulative adjective sequence and the independent clause boundary.

Anahtar Kavram

Coordinate vs. Cumulative Adjectives and Clause Boundaries
Soru 682Soru

[1] In 1766, Jeanne Baret embarked on a global voyage disguised as a male assistant to the naturalist Philibert Commerson. [2] Because Commerson suffered from poor health, Baret had to perform much of the physical labor under demanding conditions. [3] During their stops in South America, she carried heavy equipment while collecting plants. [4] In Brazil, her tireless efforts led to the discovery of a vibrant climbing vine that Commerson named *Bougainvillea* in honor of their expedition commander.

Which of the following choices, if substituted for the bolded portion of Sentence 3, best supports the claim that Baret performed demanding physical labor by providing the most specific, concrete visual details?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: carried massive wooden presses and iron trowels up the steep, muddy slopes of the Andes

Cevap

The choice that describes Baret carrying massive wooden presses and iron trowels up the steep, muddy slopes of the Andes.
The option describing Baret carrying wooden presses and iron trowels up the steep, muddy slopes of the Andes is correct because it provides the most specific, concrete visual details of her physical labor. It names the exact tools she carried and describes the specific terrain she traversed, directly supporting the claim about her demanding physical labor.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the prompt to identify the specific rhetorical goal.
The prompt asks for the choice that provides the most specific, concrete visual details of Baret's physical labor.
Understanding the precise goal prevents choosing options that are grammatically correct but rhetorically weak.
2
Evaluate each option for grammatical correctness.
The option containing a semicolon before a dependent clause is eliminated due to a sentence fragment error.
Eliminating grammatically incorrect choices narrows down the potential answers.
3
Compare the remaining grammatically correct options for visual specificity.
The option mentioning wooden presses, iron trowels, and muddy slopes of the Andes is selected over vague descriptions or unrelated details.
Specific nouns and descriptive adjectives satisfy the prompt's request for concrete visual details.

Anahtar Kavram

Supporting Claims with Evidence and Details
Tahmini Süre:1m 0s
Soru 683Soru

A writer is editing a draft of an essay about Mesoamerican agriculture.

[1] The chinampas, an ancient Mesoamerican agricultural system often referred to as "floating gardens," were highly efficient farming plots built on shallow lake beds. [2] By layering mud, decaying vegetation, and reeds, Aztec farmers created nutrient-rich fields that could support multiple harvests per year. [3] ______________ [4] Consequently, this innovative system played a vital role in feeding the rapidly growing population of the Aztec capital, Tenochtitlan.

The writer wants to insert a sentence at point [3] that provides the most specific and concrete detail to support the claim in sentence [2] regarding the productivity of the fields. Which choice best accomplishes this goal?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: These specialized plots yielded up to seven crops annually, providing enough corn, beans, and squash to sustain thousands of residents.

Cevap

The option stating that the plots yielded up to seven crops annually and provided corn, beans, and squash to sustain residents is correct because it uses specific numbers and concrete details to support the claim of high agricultural productivity.
The correct option provides concrete, quantitative evidence of the farming plots' productivity by stating they yielded up to seven crops annually and listing specific crops (corn, beans, and squash). This directly supports the claim in sentence [2] regarding multiple harvests.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the central claim in sentence 2 that needs supporting details.
The claim is that the chinampas were nutrient-rich fields that could support multiple harvests per year.
This establishes the criteria for the correct evidence: it must demonstrate high agricultural productivity and multiple harvests.
2
Evaluate the choices to find which one offers specific, concrete details supporting this productivity.
The option containing quantitative data (seven crops annually) and specific crops (corn, beans, squash) directly supports the claim with concrete details.
Standardized tests like the ACT prioritize concrete, specific details over vague generalities or off-topic information.
3
Eliminate choices that are off-topic or grammatically incorrect.
The canoe option is off-topic; the comma splice and semicolon options are grammatically incorrect.
Ensures the final selection is both contextually relevant and grammatically sound.

Anahtar Kavram

Supporting Claims with Evidence and Details
Soru 684Soru

Before the gala, the curator carefully arranged the fragile, ancient, manuscripts, and she polished the brass display cases, that would house the new exhibit.

Which choice represents the correct punctuation for the underlined portion of the sentence?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: fragile, ancient manuscripts, and she polished the brass display cases

Cevap

The correct choice is the one that places a comma only between the coordinate adjectives 'fragile' and 'ancient' and uses a comma with a coordinating conjunction to link the independent clauses without any misplaced commas around the restrictive clause.
The correct choice uses a comma between the coordinate adjectives 'fragile' and 'ancient' to show they modify the noun 'manuscripts' equally, while correctly omitting a comma between the final adjective and the noun. It also uses a comma before the coordinating conjunction 'and' to properly separate two independent clauses, and avoids placing a comma before the restrictive relative clause starting with 'that'.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Evaluate the relationship between the adjectives 'fragile' and 'ancient' modifying 'manuscripts'.
They are coordinate adjectives because they can be reversed ('ancient, fragile manuscripts') and can be joined with 'and' ('fragile and ancient manuscripts'). Thus, a comma must separate them, but no comma should separate 'ancient' from the noun 'manuscripts'.
To apply coordinate adjective punctuation rules correctly.
2
Determine the boundary between the two main clauses: 'the curator carefully arranged the fragile, ancient manuscripts' and 'she polished the brass display cases'.
Since both clauses are independent, they must be separated by either a semicolon or a comma combined with a coordinating conjunction like 'and'.
To avoid comma splices or run-on sentences.
3
Check the punctuation before the relative clause 'that would house the new exhibit'.
The relative clause is restrictive (essential to identify which display cases are meant), so it should not have a comma before it.
To follow standard punctuation rules for restrictive clauses.

Anahtar Kavram

Punctuation of coordinate adjectives, independent clauses, and restrictive clauses
Tahmini Süre:1m 0s
Soru 685Soru

To become a certified master chef, candidates must master three distinct culinary techniques, which include: braising, poaching, and emulsifying.

Which option best replaces the underlined portion of the sentence?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: techniques: braising

Cevap

techniques: braising
The correct option correctly uses a colon after the noun 'techniques'. Because the clause preceding the colon ('To become a certified master chef, candidates must master three distinct culinary techniques') is independent, the colon is grammatically permitted to introduce the list of three techniques ('braising, poaching, and emulsifying').

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the clause preceding the punctuation mark.
The clause 'To become a certified master chef, candidates must master three distinct culinary techniques' is a complete thought and can stand alone as an independent clause.
According to grammar rules, a colon must always be preceded by a complete independent clause.
2
Evaluate the relationship between the independent clause and the information that follows.
The words 'braising, poaching, and emulsifying' form a list of the specific techniques mentioned in the main clause.
A colon is the appropriate punctuation mark to introduce a list that clarifies or explains the preceding independent clause.
3
Eliminate options that violate punctuation rules.
The option containing 'which include:' is incorrect because it places a colon after a verb phrase. The option starting with 'techniques. Braising' creates a sentence fragment. The option with 'techniques, they are' creates a comma splice.
Only the option using a colon directly after the independent clause correctly and grammatically links the introduction and the list.

Anahtar Kavram

A colon must be preceded by an independent clause and is used to introduce a list, explanation, or definition.
Soru 686Soru

Yellowstone National Park is famous for its geothermal features, such as geysers and hot springs. Among these, Old Faithful is the most renowned, drawing millions of visitors each year who wait to watch its predictable eruptions.

[1] ____________________. Due to the high concentration of silica in the hot water, a unique glass-like rock forms around the geysers. This mineral crust, known as siliceous sinter, creates the distinct mounds and terraced structures that characterize Yellowstone’s volcanic landscape.

Which choice, if inserted at the blank in Paragraph [1], would most effectively introduce the main topic of the paragraph?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: The chemical composition of the spring water directly contributes to the physical structures seen around the geysers.

Cevap

The sentence stating that the chemical composition of the spring water directly contributes to the physical structures seen around the geysers is correct because it introduces the paragraph's focus on the formation of mineral crusts.
The sentence focusing on the chemical composition of the spring water and its contribution to the physical structures around the geysers is correct because it introduces the paragraph's topic of silica forming glass-like rock and mineral mounds.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the main topic of Paragraph [1] by reading the sentences that follow the blank.
The paragraph explains that high concentrations of silica in the water lead to the formation of glass-like rock and physical mounds around the geysers.
Establishing an effective introduction requires understanding the specific focus of the paragraph it introduces.
2
Evaluate the choices to find the one that best introduces this topic.
The sentence about the chemical composition of the spring water directly contributing to the physical structures matches the focus on water silica forming mounds.
An effective introduction must set up the details that follow in the paragraph.
3
Check the remaining options for grammatical errors and relevance.
The other options are eliminated due to being off-topic, containing a comma splice, being a sentence fragment, or containing redundant language.
ACT English questions require the correct choice to be both grammatically correct and rhetorically appropriate.

Anahtar Kavram

Establishing Paragraph Introductions
Soru 687Soru

In the late afternoon, thousands of starlings gather in the sky to perform complex aerial maneuvers known as murmurations. These synchronized flocks shape-shift fluidly without any single leader directing the group; each bird simply responds to the movements of its closest neighbors.

Which of the following alternatives to the underlined portion is grammatically correct?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: NO CHANGE

Cevap

The original phrasing, which uses a semicolon to connect the two independent clauses, is correct.
The underlined portion correctly uses a semicolon to join two closely related independent clauses ('These synchronized flocks shape-shift fluidly without any single leader directing the group' and 'each bird simply responds to the movements of its closest neighbors') without a coordinating conjunction.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Determine if the clauses before and after the underlined portion are independent or dependent.
Both 'These synchronized flocks shape-shift fluidly without any single leader directing the group' and 'each bird simply responds to the movements of its closest neighbors' can stand alone as complete sentences, meaning they are both independent clauses.
Identifying the clause types is necessary to choose the correct punctuation to join them.
2
Evaluate the grammar of each punctuation option for joining two independent clauses.
A semicolon alone is a valid way to join two independent clauses. A comma alone creates a comma splice. A semicolon followed by 'because' creates an incomplete dependent clause (fragment). A semicolon followed by 'and' is redundant and grammatically incorrect.
This process of elimination helps identify the correct grammatical structure.

Anahtar Kavram

Using a semicolon to connect two independent clauses without a coordinating conjunction.
Tahmini Süre:45s
Soru 688Soru

[1] In the early twentieth century, Japanese-American artist Chiura Obata captured the grandeur of the California wilderness through his unique fusion of traditional Japanese ink-painting techniques and Western landscape styles. [2] During his 1927 trek through Yosemite National Park, Obata worked tirelessly to document the dramatic topography. [3] He claimed that the park's natural features possessed a spiritual, dynamic energy that could only be captured through precise, expressive brushwork. [4] To convey this sense of raw energy, Obata focused his attention on the park's most iconic geological formations.

The writer wants to add a sentence after Sentence 4 that provides the most specific, concrete visual detail to support the claim in Sentence 3. Which of the following sentences best accomplishes this goal?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: He utilized sweeping, indigo-dyed brushstrokes to depict the towering granite face of Half Dome reflecting the stark, golden light of a late autumn sunset.

Cevap

The sentence describing how Obata utilized sweeping, indigo-dyed brushstrokes to depict Half Dome reflecting golden sunset light is the correct choice because it provides the most specific, concrete visual details to support the claim about capturing Yosemite's dynamic energy.
The correct answer is the option describing Obata using sweeping, indigo-dyed brushstrokes to depict the granite face of Half Dome in the golden light of sunset. This sentence provides highly specific, sensory, and concrete visual details that directly illustrate how his 'expressive brushwork' captured the 'dynamic energy' of the park's geological formations, fulfilling the rhetorical goal stated in the prompt.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the prompt's request.
The prompt asks for a sentence that provides the most 'specific, concrete visual detail' to support the claim in Sentence 3, which states that Yosemite's features possessed a 'spiritual, dynamic energy' requiring 'precise, expressive brushwork.'
This establishes the target criteria: the option must contain concrete imagery and relate directly to the energy and brushwork claim.
2
Evaluate the grammatical correctness and specificity of each option.
The option starting with 'Because' is a fragment, and the option starting with 'Hoping' contains a dangling modifier. The option mentioning the portfolio is grammatically correct but highly vague and general. The option describing Half Dome with 'sweeping, indigo-dyed brushstrokes' and 'stark, golden light' is grammatically correct and loaded with specific visual details.
ACT English questions require both grammatical correctness and alignment with specific rhetorical goals.
3
Select the option that meets both the rhetorical and grammatical constraints.
The option containing the detailed description of Half Dome and the golden light is the only one that is both grammatically sound and highly specific.
It successfully illustrates 'expressive brushwork' and 'dynamic energy' through concrete imagery.

Anahtar Kavram

Supporting Claims with Evidence and Details
Tahmini Süre:1m 0s
Soru 689Soru

During the monsoon season, the steps of the *baoli* (a traditional Indian stepwell) would be submerged, but as the water level receded during dry months, more levels of the structure were revealed. This seasonal rise and fall made the stepwell a dynamic monument, constantly shifting in appearance. In addition to water storage, the stepwells served as cooling chambers; temperatures at the bottom of the descent could be up to six degrees Celsius cooler than at the surface. Modern mechanical cooling systems, which were invented in the early twentieth century, operate on a different thermodynamic principle entirely. This subterranean drop in temperature made the lower ledges of the wells popular gathering spots where local communities could escape the midday heat.

The writer is considering deleting the underlined sentence. Should the writer make this deletion?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Delete it, because it introduces a digression about modern cooling systems that deviates from the paragraph's focus on the stepwells' design and social functions.

Cevap

Delete the sentence because it introduces a digression about modern cooling systems that deviates from the paragraph's focus on the stepwells' design and social functions.
The paragraph is focused on the design, function, and social utility of traditional stepwells. The underlined sentence introduces an irrelevant detail about the invention and mechanics of modern mechanical cooling systems, which disrupts the flow of the paragraph. Therefore, the sentence should be deleted because it is a digression.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the main focus of the paragraph.
The paragraph describes how stepwells work, their cooling properties, and how these factors made them popular social gathering spaces.
Understanding the paragraph's core topic is essential to evaluating whether any single sentence is relevant.
2
Analyze the content and function of the sentence in question.
The sentence discusses when modern mechanical cooling systems were invented and how they operate on different thermodynamic principles.
This determines if the sentence contributes to or distracts from the main topic.
3
Compare the sentence's function with the paragraph's focus to determine whether to keep or delete it.
The sentence about modern technology is a digression that interrupts the description of stepwells. Therefore, it should be deleted because it is irrelevant.
A sentence should be deleted if it distracts from the paragraph's main theme, even if it shares a general keyword like 'cooling'.

Anahtar Kavram

Evaluating Relevance for Adding or Deleting Content
Soru 690Soru

A writer is editing a draft of an essay about aerospace engineer Mary Golda Ross.

[1] As the first female Native American aerospace engineer, Mary Golda Ross made critical contributions to the early space age during her time at Lockheed's top-secret Skunk Works division. [2] Although her initial assignments focused on improving the aerodynamics of fighter jets, she was soon transitioned to the burgeoning space program. [3] There, Ross was tasked with developing design concepts for interplanetary space travel. [4] To ensure the success of these journeys, she formulated mathematical models detailing the trajectories required to navigate the gravitational fields of multiple celestial bodies.

The writer wants to revise the underlined portion of sentence 3 ('design concepts for interplanetary space travel') to provide the most specific and concrete details that illustrate the technical scope of Ross’s interplanetary design work. Which choice best accomplishes this goal?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: trajectory profiles, thermodynamic shielding requirements, and flyby flight paths for missions to Venus and Mars.

Cevap

The correct choice is the option that replaces the underlined text with 'trajectory profiles, thermodynamic shielding requirements, and flyby flight paths for missions to Venus and Mars.'
The correct option provides specific, concrete technical terms ('trajectory profiles, thermodynamic shielding requirements, and flyby flight paths') that directly illustrate the technical scope and complexity of the interplanetary space travel design work, successfully fulfilling the writer's goal.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the writer's specific rhetorical goal in the prompt.
The goal is to find the option that provides the most specific and concrete details illustrating the technical scope of Ross's interplanetary design work.
Understanding the goal helps filter out options that are grammatically correct but fail to address the prompt's specific requirement.
2
Analyze the options for specificity and relevance to interplanetary design work.
The original text and the option focusing on 'various plans and ideas' are too vague, while the option about Lockheed's facilities is off-topic. The option listing 'trajectory profiles, thermodynamic shielding requirements, and flyby flight paths' provides precise, technical details.
Comparing the options ensures we choose the one that provides concrete visual/technical detail over general statements.
3
Confirm that the selected option is grammatically correct and fits seamlessly into sentence 3.
The selected option fits grammatically and logically within the context of the sentence.
Ensures the revision maintains standard sentence structure and cohesion within the paragraph.

Anahtar Kavram

Supporting Claims with Evidence and Details
Soru 691Soru

Mauveine's Moment

[1]
In 1856, eighteen-year-old chemistry student William Henry Perkin was attempting to synthesize quinine, a drug used to treat malaria, in his home laboratory in London. During his experiments, he ended up with a dark, sticky sludge in his beaker. Instead of discarding the failed mixture, Perkin investigated further, dilute-washing the substance with alcohol. To his surprise, the solution turned a vibrant, deep purple color.

[2]
This purple substance, which he eventually named mauveine, was the world's first synthetic organic dye. Before Perkin’s accidental discovery, dyes were derived exclusively from natural sources like plants, insects, and minerals. Producing purple dye, in particular, was labor-intensive and expensive, requiring thousands of Mediterranean snails to yield just a tiny amount of color. Consequently, purple clothing had long been a symbol of extreme wealth and royalty.

[3]
Recognizing the commercial potential of his discovery, Perkin patented the process and established a factory to mass-produce the dye. The new dye was cheap to manufacture, highly colorfast, and easily bound to fabrics like silk and cotton. The demand exploded, sparking a fashion craze across Europe and transforming purple from an exclusive luxury into an accessible color for everyday citizens.

[4]
Perkin’s breakthrough laid the foundation for the modern chemical industry. Scientists began synthesizing other colors, leading to a rapid expansion of industrial chemistry and the development of synthetic pharmaceuticals. Perkin’s accidental sludge changed not only the fashion world but also the trajectory of scientific research.

Suppose the writer's goal had been to write an essay that explains the chemical process used to synthesize mauveine from start to finish. Based on the passage, is the statement that the essay successfully achieves this goal true or false?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: False

Cevap

False
The correct answer is False. The essay does not provide the chemical equations, starting compounds, or step-by-step chemical procedures required to explain the synthesis of mauveine from start to finish. Instead, the passage is a historical narrative detailing the accidental discovery of the dye and its impact on European fashion and the modern chemical industry.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the hypothetical writing goal specified in the prompt.
The goal is to write an essay that explains the chemical process used to synthesize mauveine from start to finish.
This establishes the benchmark against which the actual text must be evaluated.
2
Analyze the passage for details explaining the chemical synthesis of mauveine.
The passage states that Perkin was trying to synthesize quinine and washed a residue with alcohol. It does not provide chemical equations, list starting organic compounds, or detail the steps of the synthesis reaction.
This determines if the technical details required by the goal are present in the text.
3
Evaluate the main theme and focus of the essay.
The essay focuses on the historical narrative of Perkin's accidental discovery, the contrast between natural and synthetic dyes, and the commercial and industrial consequences of the breakthrough. It is a historical and rhetorical overview rather than a chemical explanation. Thus, the goal is not met.
This leads directly to the conclusion that the statement is false.

Anahtar Kavram

Evaluating Whole-Essay Goals and Purpose
Tahmini Süre:1m 30s
Soru 692Soru

The following sentences are from a draft of an essay about forest ecology. To ensure that the paragraph logically builds its claim that trees support one another through fungal networks, in what order should the sentences be placed?

Öğeleri doğru sıraya koymak için sürükleyin

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap

The sentences should be ordered to introduce the network first, describe its function next, provide evidence of resource sharing third, and state the survival outcome last.
The paragraph starts with the opening claim that introduces the mycelium network. It then proceeds logically to describe how the network links roots, explains the action of resource sharing through these pathways, and finishes with the final result of this sharing on the survival of young trees.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Locate the introductory claim.
The sentence introducing the mycelium network is the first sentence.
It introduces the topic of the paragraph without requiring prior context.
2
Find the description of the network.
The sentence describing the 'Wood Wide Web' is the second sentence.
The phrase 'This subterranean network' refers directly back to the mycelium network introduced in the first sentence.
3
Identify the sentence providing supporting evidence.
The sentence explaining how mature trees share carbon and water with seedlings is the third sentence.
It explains the resource-sharing function of the newly described pathways.
4
Identify the consequence of the evidence.
The sentence detailing how young trees survive in the dark forest understory is the fourth sentence.
It uses the phrase 'As a result of this nutrient sharing' to show the outcome of the resource sharing established in the third sentence.

Anahtar Kavram

Supporting claims with evidence and logical sequence
Soru 693Soru

The sentences below are from a draft of a scientific essay about marine camouflage. What is the most logical order for these sentences to ensure that the supporting evidence follows the main claim?

Öğeleri doğru sıraya koymak için sürükleyin

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap

The correct order of the sentences is: 'The Hawaiian bobtail squid employs a sophisticated method of camouflage...', followed by 'This technique relies on a symbiotic relationship...', then 'These bacteria produce a blue-green light...', and finally 'By matching the ambient light...'.
The correct sequence begins with the main claim about the squid's counterillumination camouflage, followed by the introduction of the symbiotic bacteria ('This technique...'), then the detail about how the bacteria produce light ('These bacteria...'), and concludes with the direct outcome of how this light matching prevents predation ('By matching...'). This ensures each sentence builds on the previous one, and the supporting details logically validate the initial claim.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the introductory sentence that makes the main claim.
The sentence introducing the Hawaiian bobtail squid's use of counterillumination camouflage is the only one that does not rely on referring back to a previous concept, making it the logical start.
Establishing the main claim first sets the context for all subsequent details.
2
Look for transition words or referential pronouns that link sentences together.
The phrase 'This technique' links the second sentence directly to the 'counterillumination' technique in the first sentence, and 'These bacteria' links the third sentence to the 'bacteria' mentioned in the second sentence.
Referential pronouns require a previously introduced antecedent to be grammatically and logically coherent.
3
Connect the final outcome to the initial claim.
The sentence beginning 'By matching the ambient light' describes how the squid eliminates its shadow and prevents detection by predators, which directly supports the claim of evading predators introduced in the first sentence.
Concluding the paragraph with the ultimate function of the camouflage shows how the evidence supports the main claim.

Anahtar Kavram

Ordering sentences to ensure that supporting evidence logically builds upon and substantiates a central claim.
Soru 694Soru

To forecast the weather accurately, meteorologists rely on a variety of advanced instruments: barometers, anemometers, and hygrometers.

Which of the following options correctly punctuates the underlined portion of the sentence?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: NO CHANGE

Cevap

The choice that reads 'NO CHANGE' is correct because the clause before the colon is independent and the colon properly introduces a list of weather instruments.
The choice that leaves the sentence unchanged is correct. The clause before the colon is a complete independent clause, and the colon is the standard punctuation mark used to introduce a list of examples.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the clause preceding the underlined portion and determine if it can stand alone as a complete sentence.
The clause 'To forecast the weather accurately, meteorologists rely on a variety of advanced instruments' contains a subject and verb and is independent.
A colon can only be used if it is preceded by a complete independent clause.
2
Analyze the function of the information following the punctuation.
The items 'barometers, anemometers, and hygrometers' function as a list of examples clarifying the 'instruments'.
A colon is appropriate to introduce a list, explanation, or elaboration.
3
Evaluate the incorrect options against the rules for semicolons, colons, and commas.
Semicolons require independent clauses on both sides; placing a colon after 'including' creates an incomplete sentence; a comma alone does not provide the correct grammatical transition for this list.
Eliminating grammatically incorrect choices helps identify the correct punctuation choice.

Anahtar Kavram

A colon must be preceded by a complete independent clause and can be used to introduce a list, explanation, or quote.
Soru 695Soru

The following sentences are from a draft of an essay about organic chemist Percy Julian. To ensure that the paragraph logically builds its claim that Julian successfully refuted his rival's work, in what order should the sentences be arranged?

Öğeleri doğru sıraya koymak için sürükleyin

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap

The correct logical sequence starts with the introduction of Percy Julian's 19351935 race to synthesize physostigmine, followed by the claim that his rival's structure was flawed. The paragraph then details the comparative testing process, presents the specific melting point evidence of 135C135^\circ\text{C}, and concludes with the significance of this thermodynamic measurement.
The correct order follows a clear progression from claim to method, evidence, and conclusion. The paragraph begins by introducing Percy Julian's 19351935 race to synthesize physostigmine. It then introduces his career-defining claim: that Robert Robinson's published molecular structure was flawed. The transition 'To prove this' connects this claim to Julian's method of comparing physical properties. The next sentence provides the specific empirical detail—the melting point of 135C135^\circ\text{C}—that serves as the definitive proof. Finally, the concluding sentence begins with 'This precise thermodynamic measurement,' which refers back to the melting point data and explains the significance of the results.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the introductory sentence that establishes the overall context.
The sentence introducing Percy Julian's 19351935 effort to synthesize physostigmine.
It establishes the subject, compound, and timeline necessary for the paragraph's setting.
2
Locate the primary claim that requires supporting evidence.
The sentence asserting that Julian staked his career on Robinson's structure being flawed.
This sets up the conflict and the specific claim that the rest of the paragraph must support.
3
Find the transitional sentence describing the test of this claim.
The sentence beginning 'To prove this' describing the synthesis and comparison of physical properties.
The phrase 'To prove this' directly links back to the claim of a flawed molecular structure, and it outlines the method used to obtain evidence.
4
Identify the specific empirical details representing the evidence.
The sentence stating that Julian's synthetic crystals melted at exactly 135C135^\circ\text{C} while Robinson's did not.
This provides the concrete details from the comparison mentioned in the previous step.
5
Identify the concluding sentence explaining the outcome of the evidence.
The sentence starting with 'This precise thermodynamic measurement' establishing Julian's breakthrough.
The phrase 'This precise thermodynamic measurement' refers directly back to the melting point data and completes the logical progression.

Anahtar Kavram

Supporting Claims with Evidence and Details
Tahmini Süre:2m 0s
Soru 696Soru

In the 1940s, geneticist Barbara McClintock studied the inheritance patterns of maize plants. Her research on transposons, which are DNA sequences that can move within a genome, eventually earned her a Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine. This groundbreaking work challenged the long-held belief that genes were static entities on chromosomes.

Which choice best punctuates the underlined portion of the sentence?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: on transposons, which are DNA sequences that can move within a genome,

Cevap

on transposons, which are DNA sequences that can move within a genome,
The correct choice properly uses a comma before 'which' and a comma after 'genome' to enclose the nonessential relative clause 'which are DNA sequences that can move within a genome.' This clause provides descriptive details about 'transposons' but is not essential to the overall sentence structure.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the parenthetical or nonessential element in the sentence.
The phrase 'which are DNA sequences that can move within a genome' provides supplementary descriptive information about 'transposons.' The core sentence remains complete without it: 'Her research on transposons eventually earned her a Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine.'
Nonessential elements must be set off from the rest of the sentence by punctuation (typically commas).
2
Apply the appropriate punctuation rules for nonessential elements.
Since the nonessential element appears in the middle of the sentence, it must be enclosed by a pair of commas: one before 'which' and one after 'genome.'
Omitting one of the commas results in a dangling comma error, and using a semicolon instead of a comma incorrectly separates a dependent clause from its main clause.
3
Check the restrictive clause within the nonessential element.
The clause 'that can move within a genome' restricts 'DNA sequences' and should not be separated from it by a comma.
Restrictive clauses are essential to the meaning and must not be separated from their referent with commas.

Anahtar Kavram

Commas with Nonessential and Parenthetical Elements
Tahmini Süre:1m 0s
Soru 697Soru

[1] In the depths of the ocean, hydrothermal vents support unique ecosystems that thrive completely independent of sunlight. [2] Instead of relying on photosynthesis, the primary producers in these environments—specialized bacteria—utilize chemosynthesis to convert chemical energy from the vents' mineral-rich fluids into organic matter. [3] These chemosynthetic bacteria often form symbiotic relationships with larger organisms, such as giant tube worms, which lack mouths and digestive tracts. [4] Tube worms possess bright red plumes filled with hemoglobin that absorb hydrogen sulfide and oxygen from the water. [5] The bacteria reside inside a specialized organ within the tube worm called a trophosome, where they use the raw materials delivered by the worm's bloodstream to produce nutrients. [6] This elegant partnership demonstrates how life can adapt to survive in some of the most extreme conditions on Earth.

The writer is considering deleting Sentence 4 from the passage. Should this sentence be kept or deleted?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Kept, because it explains how the tube worms acquire the chemical compounds that the symbiotic bacteria use to generate nutrients.

Cevap

The sentence should be kept because it explains how the tube worms acquire the chemical compounds that the symbiotic bacteria use to generate nutrients.
The sentence should be kept because it provides the necessary explanation of how the tube worms absorb the specific chemical compounds (hydrogen sulfide and oxygen) that are transported via their bloodstream to the symbiotic bacteria residing in the trophosome.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the function of Sentence 4 in the context of the paragraph.
Sentence 4 describes the tube worms' plumes absorbing hydrogen sulfide and oxygen from the water.
This identifies the specific substances the worms take in and mentions hemoglobin, which is involved in transport.
2
Analyze Sentence 5 to see if it relies on information from Sentence 4.
Sentence 5 refers to 'raw materials delivered by the worm's bloodstream' which the bacteria use to produce nutrients.
The 'raw materials' are the hydrogen sulfide and oxygen introduced in Sentence 4, and the 'bloodstream' transport is facilitated by the 'hemoglobin' introduced in Sentence 4.
3
Evaluate the impact of deleting Sentence 4.
Without Sentence 4, the phrase 'the raw materials delivered by the worm's bloodstream' in Sentence 5 has no logical antecedent, creating a gap in explanation.
Therefore, Sentence 4 is essential to the paragraph's explanation and must be kept.

Anahtar Kavram

Evaluating sentence relevance based on structural cohesion and the establishment of logical antecedents for subsequent sentences.
Soru 698Soru

Although the two separate engineering teams worked diligently on the locomotive, the crews' primary concern was it's electrical system.

Which choice is the correct spelling and punctuation of the underlined portion of the sentence?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: crews' primary concern was its

Cevap

crews' primary concern was its
The correct answer is 'crews' primary concern was its'. Since the sentence specifies that there are 'two separate engineering teams,' the plural possessive noun 'crews'' is required to show ownership of the 'concern.' In addition, the pronoun refers to the singular noun 'locomotive,' which requires the possessive pronoun 'its' rather than the contraction 'it's' (which means 'it is').

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Determine if the noun referring to the engineering teams should be singular or plural, and if it requires possessive punctuation.
The sentence references 'two separate engineering teams,' which indicates multiple groups. Therefore, the plural noun 'crews' is needed. Because the 'concern' belongs to these crews, the noun must be possessive. The correct plural possessive spelling is 'crews''.
For plural nouns ending in 's,' the possessive is formed by adding an apostrophe after the final 's.'
2
Determine whether the possessive pronoun 'its' or the contraction 'it's' is appropriate to refer to the locomotive's system.
The pronoun modifies 'electrical system' and refers back to the singular locomotive. A possessive pronoun is required here. The spelling 'its' represents the possessive pronoun, whereas 'it's' is a contraction for 'it is.'
Possessive pronouns do not use apostrophes, while apostrophes in pronouns indicate contractions.
3
Combine the findings to select the correct choice.
The option containing the plural possessive noun 'crews'' and the possessive pronoun 'its' is the only grammatically correct combination.
It matches the plural antecedent of the teams and avoids the contraction error.

Anahtar Kavram

Apostrophes are used to show possession for nouns (adding 's for singular nouns and an apostrophe after the s for plural nouns ending in s) but are never used for possessive pronouns like 'its' (which is the possessive form, while 'it's' is a contraction for 'it is').
Soru 699Soru

During the 2018 restoration of the Prague Astronomical Clock, conservators replaced the replica of the nineteenth-century calendar dial with a new version. The original paintings by Josef Mánes celebrate Bohemian agricultural life. [2] The new replica, however, featured thick, harsh outlines and stylized features that critics argued belonged in a mid-century comic book rather than on a medieval monument.

The writer wants to add a sentence at Point [2] that establishes a clear stylistic contrast between Mánes's original paintings and the newly installed replica. Which choice best accomplishes this goal?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: These original pieces utilized a delicate, academic realism to personify the months of the year as peasants engaged in seasonal labor.

Cevap

The correct option is the one stating that the original pieces utilized a delicate, academic realism to personify the months of the year as peasants engaged in seasonal labor.
The correct choice is the option that describes the original pieces utilizing a delicate, academic realism. This sentence is grammatically correct and successfully establishes a contrast between the traditional style ('delicate, academic realism') and the modern style described in the following sentence ('thick, harsh outlines').

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the prompt's rhetorical goal.
The prompt requires a sentence that establishes a clear stylistic contrast between Josef Mánes's original paintings and the newly installed replica.
This helps target only the choices that describe artistic style rather than historical dates or preservation efforts.
2
Evaluate the choices for grammatical correctness.
The option describing the original designs relying on subtle shading and the new version replacing it with flat color fields is a comma splice, joining two independent clauses without a coordinating conjunction or proper punctuation.
ACT English requires all correct choices to be grammatically flawless, eliminating options with structural errors regardless of their content.
3
Evaluate the remaining grammatically correct choices against the rhetorical goal.
The option about museum preservation and the option about the completion year (1865) do not describe style. Only the option describing 'delicate, academic realism' provides the correct stylistic contrast.
This identifies the single choice that is both grammatically correct and rhetorically appropriate.

Anahtar Kavram

Meeting Specific Rhetorical Goals
Soru 700Soru

The following passage contains an underlined portion.

In 1952, British biophysicist Rosalind Franklin captured a groundbreaking X-ray diffraction image of DNA. This photograph, which was known as Photo 51, showed a pattern that was crucial to Watson and Crick’s discovery of the double helix. Today, Franklin is widely recognized for her critical contributions to molecular biology.

Which of the following choices represents the correct punctuation for the underlined portion of the passage?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: NO CHANGE

Cevap

The correct answer is the option that keeps the original punctuation, which correctly uses a pair of commas to set off the nonessential clause and leaves the restrictive clause unpunctuated.
The correct option correctly identifies 'which was known as Photo 51' as a nonessential clause and sets it off with a pair of commas. It also correctly recognizes 'that was crucial' as a restrictive clause and leaves it unpunctuated, maintaining the connection to its noun referent.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify nonessential (parenthetical) and essential (restrictive) elements in the sentence.
The clause 'which was known as Photo 51' is nonessential because removing it does not change the core meaning of the sentence. The clause 'that was crucial' is restrictive because it defines which specific pattern is being discussed.
Nonessential elements must be set off by commas, while restrictive elements must not be set off by commas.
2
Evaluate the punctuation around the nonessential element.
A pair of commas must enclose 'which was known as Photo 51', placing one comma after 'photograph' and another after 'Photo 51'.
Omitting either comma leaves a dangling punctuation mark and disrupts the grammatical structure.
3
Evaluate the punctuation around the restrictive element.
No commas should separate the noun 'pattern' from the relative clause 'that was crucial'.
Adding commas around a restrictive clause incorrectly isolates essential identifying information.

Anahtar Kavram

Commas with Nonessential and Parenthetical Elements
Tahmini Süre:1m 0s
ÖncekiSayfa 35 / 278Sonraki
Tüm alıştırma soruları — ACT | Examkin