Tüm alıştırma soruları

5556 soru

Soru 1121Soru

For centuries, the hieroglyphic carvings on ancient Egyptian monuments remained unreadable, their meanings lost to time. The breakthrough came in 1799 when French soldiers discovered a dark stone slab near the town of Rosetta. [1] This artifact, later known as the Rosetta Stone, featured a royal decree inscribed in three distinct scripts: hieroglyphs, Demotic, and Ancient Greek. Because scholars could already read Ancient Greek, they used this familiar text as a translation key to decipher the other two scripts. Jean-François Champollion eventually cracked the hieroglyphic code in 1822, opening a window into thousands of years of Egyptian history.

The writer is considering adding the following sentence at Point [1]:

"French troops in Egypt often encountered difficult desert conditions and suffered from various tropical diseases."

Should the writer make this addition here?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: No, because it introduces irrelevant details about the soldiers' health that distract from the paragraph's focus on the discovery and decipherment of the Rosetta Stone.

Cevap

The writer should not add the sentence because it introduces irrelevant details about the soldiers' health and living conditions, which distracts from the paragraph's central focus on the discovery and decipherment of the Rosetta Stone.
The correct choice is the option explaining that the sentence should not be added because it introduces irrelevant details about the soldiers' health that distract from the focus on the Rosetta Stone's discovery and decipherment. The paragraph is centered on the Rosetta Stone as a translation key for hieroglyphs, not the personal experiences or struggles of the French army.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the main focus of the paragraph.
The paragraph describes the discovery of the Rosetta Stone and how its multilingual inscriptions allowed scholars to decipher ancient Egyptian hieroglyphs.
To evaluate whether to add a sentence, you must first determine the central theme of the surrounding text.
2
Analyze the proposed sentence to see what information it adds.
The proposed sentence describes the difficult desert conditions and tropical diseases experienced by French troops in Egypt.
Understanding the content of the proposed addition allows you to compare it to the main topic of the passage.
3
Determine if the proposed sentence is relevant to the main topic.
The hardships of the soldiers are irrelevant to the linguistic breakthrough of deciphering hieroglyphs. Adding this sentence would disrupt the flow of the paragraph by introducing a tangential topic.
A sentence should only be added if it supports the main idea of the paragraph or provides a necessary transition.

Anahtar Kavram

Evaluating relevance for adding or deleting content
Soru 1122Soru

The following paragraph is from an essay about the history of everyday inventions.

[1] In 1849, American inventor Walter Hunt was twisting a piece of brass wire while trying to think of a way to pay off a fifteen-dollar debt. [2] He realized that by coiling the wire at the base, it would spring back when released. [3] To protect the user, he added a clasp at the top to cover the sharp point. [4] Hunt patented his design as the safety pin and sold the rights for four hundred dollars, quickly settling his debt.

To make this paragraph most logical, where should the following sentence be placed?
"This clever design feature not only prevented accidental pricks but also secured the pin in place."

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: after Sentence 3

Cevap

after Sentence 3
The correct answer is the option that places the sentence after Sentence 3. Sentence 3 describes how Hunt 'added a clasp at the top to cover the sharp point.' The target sentence refers to 'This clever design feature' and explains how it 'prevented accidental pricks.' This creates a logical connection because the clasp covering the sharp point is the design feature that prevents pricks. Placing the target sentence after Sentence 3 ensures a smooth, coherent flow before the paragraph concludes with Hunt patenting the design in Sentence 4.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the key transition or logical clue in the target sentence.
The target sentence contains the phrase 'This clever design feature' and mentions preventing 'accidental pricks'.
Recognizing pointing pronouns and descriptive noun phrases helps locate the sentence containing their direct antecedent.
2
Scan the paragraph to find the specific sentence that introduces the 'design feature' that prevents 'accidental pricks'.
Sentence 3 introduces the 'clasp at the top' which was added to 'cover the sharp point' and 'protect the user'.
The reference to covering the sharp point to protect the user aligns logically with preventing accidental pricks.
3
Verify the flow of the paragraph with the target sentence inserted after Sentence 3.
Sentence 3 introduces the clasp, the target sentence details how it works ('prevented accidental pricks'), and Sentence 4 concludes with the patenting and sale of the pin. The sequence flows logically.
Verifying the overall placement ensures the sentence fits seamlessly without disrupting the narrative chronological flow.

Anahtar Kavram

Identifying pronoun-antecedent relationships and logical flow to determine correct sentence placement.
Tahmini Süre:45s
Soru 1123Soru

The following is an excerpt from a passage about the history of computer programming:

[1] __________________________________________________ In the early decades of the twentieth century, programming required writing tedious, highly specific sequences of numbers that directly controlled a computer's hardware. Grace Hopper, a mathematician and U.S. Navy officer, believed there was a better way. She envisioned a system where programmers could write instructions using English-like commands, which a program would then translate into machine code. Despite widespread skepticism from her peers, Hopper went on to create the compiler, laying the foundation for modern programming languages.

Which of the following choices, if placed in the blank at [1], most effectively introduces the passage by establishing its central focus on Grace Hopper’s revolutionary contribution to computer programming?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Although early computers were powerful, their utility was restricted by the complex numerical codes required to program them—a challenge that one scientist was determined to overcome.

Cevap

The option stating that although early computers were powerful, their utility was restricted by the complex numerical codes required to program them—a challenge that one scientist was determined to overcome.
The option that begins with 'Although early computers were powerful' is correct because it introduces both the initial obstacle of complex numerical coding and the central figure (the scientist) who would address it, setting up the rest of the passage smoothly and logically without any grammatical errors.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the context of the paragraph to determine what the missing sentence needs to introduce.
The passage discusses the tedious nature of early computer programming and how Grace Hopper revolutionized the field by introducing compilers.
An effective introduction must establish the main challenge of programming early computers and hint at the person who solved it.
2
Evaluate the grammar of the options to eliminate structurally incorrect choices.
Three options contain distinct errors: a comma splice, an improper semicolon separating a dependent clause, and an unnecessary tense shift.
ACT English questions require that introductory sentences conform to standard grammatical rules.
3
Select the grammatically correct option that best fulfills the rhetorical goal.
The option that introduces the challenge of numerical codes and the scientist's determination to overcome it is both grammatically correct and contextually appropriate.
It logically connects to the subsequent description of early programming and Hopper's later achievements.

Anahtar Kavram

Establishing Introductions and Thesis Statements
Soru 1124Soru

Deciphering the Bronze Age

[1]
For decades, the clay tablets unearthed at the ancient palace of Knossos by archaeologist Arthur Evans remained an impenetrable mystery. Written in a script dubbed "Linear B," these inscriptions defied translation, leaving scholars to debate whether the language was Basque, Etruscan, or an early form of Greek. Evans himself fiercely maintained that Linear B could not possibly be Greek, believing it belonged to a distinct Minoan civilization that dominated the Aegean long before the rise of Mycenae. This authoritative stance discouraged many researchers from pursuing Greek linguistic leads, thereby stalling progress for nearly half a century.

[2]
The breakthrough finally came in the early 1950s through the collaborative, yet independent, efforts of Alice Kober and Michael Ventris. Kober, a classicist at Brooklyn College, meticulously recorded grammatical patterns on thousands of index cards, proving that the language was inflected—meaning that word endings changed to indicate grammatical relationships. Following her untimely death, Ventris, an architect with a passion for codes, built upon her work. By constructing a grid that mapped consonant and vowel relationships, Ventris unlocked the phonetic values of the symbols and realized, to his own surprise, that the tablets were indeed written in an archaic Greek dialect.

[3]
[ 1 ] The tablets did not contain epic poetry or grand historical narratives, as some had hoped, but were instead mundane administrative records: lists of sheep, jars of olive oil, and distributions of bronze to local smiths. Yet, in their very domesticity, these documents provided invaluable insights into the highly centralized palace economy and social hierarchy of late Bronze Age Greece.

Which of the following sentences, if added at the bracketed marker [ 1 ] in the third paragraph, would provide the most logical transition from the second paragraph and introduce the main topic of the third paragraph?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Once the script was deciphered, the contents of the tablets revealed a surprisingly bureaucratic reality.

Cevap

The correct answer is the sentence stating that once the script was deciphered, the contents of the tablets revealed a surprisingly bureaucratic reality.
The sentence stating that once the script was deciphered, the contents of the tablets revealed a surprisingly bureaucratic reality is correct because it creates a seamless transition from the decipherment of the Greek dialect at the end of the second paragraph to the description of the mundane clay tablet contents at the start of the third. It is also grammatically correct and maintains the passage's formal tone.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the end of the second paragraph and the beginning of the third paragraph to identify the transition requirements.
The second paragraph ends with the discovery that the tablets were written in an archaic Greek dialect (decipherment). The third paragraph describes the actual contents of the tablets (administrative lists of sheep, oil, etc. rather than poetry).
An effective transition must bridge these two ideas: the act of decipherment and the nature of the contents revealed.
2
Evaluate the choices for grammatical correctness and sentence structure.
Three options contain grammatical errors: one is a dependent clause fragment beginning with 'Although', one has a dangling modifier where 'the tablets' are incorrectly modified by the purpose of understanding the economy, and one incorrectly uses a semicolon to connect a dependent clause starting with 'which'. Only the sentence starting with 'Once the script was deciphered' is grammatically correct.
ACT English questions require the correct choice to be grammatically precise and free of syntax errors.
3
Select the option that is both grammatically correct and provides the most logical flow.
The sentence starting with 'Once the script was deciphered' smoothly links the resolution of the mystery (decipherment) to the mundane nature of the records described in the rest of the paragraph.
This option satisfies both the grammatical constraints and the rhetorical purpose of paragraph unity and cohesion.

Anahtar Kavram

Opening and Concluding Sentences
Tahmini Süre:1m 0s
Soru 1125Soru

The following passage describes the reception of the potato in Europe.

[1] When Spanish conquistadors first brought the potato to Europe in the sixteenth century, the unfamiliar tuber was met with suspicion. [2] Many Europeans feared the vegetable because it was not mentioned in the Bible, and others suspected it of causing leprosy. [3] In France, the crown even went so far as to ban potato cultivation entirely in 1748. [4] Recognizing the crop's potential to combat famine, French army pharmacist Antoine-Augustin Parmentier set out to change public perception. [5] He established heavily guarded potato patches near Paris, instructing the guards to accept bribes and look the other way when locals tried to steal the "royal" plants.

To make the paragraph flow most logically, where should the following sentence be placed?

"This clever reverse-psychology campaign succeeded in generating curiosity and ultimately popularized the crop."

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: after Sentence 5

Cevap

after Sentence 5
Placing the target sentence after the final sentence of the paragraph is the most logical choice because 'This clever reverse-psychology campaign' directly refers to the strategy detailed in the fifth sentence (guarding the patches but allowing thefts). This placement allows the target sentence to serve as a conclusion to the anecdote by stating the outcome of the campaign.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the target sentence for logical and transitional clues.
The target sentence begins with the demonstrative noun phrase 'This clever reverse-psychology campaign,' indicating it must immediately follow a description of a specific campaign or action that utilizes reverse psychology.
Identifying transition markers and pronoun/determiner referents is essential for determining correct sentence placement.
2
Evaluate the paragraph's sentences to find where the campaign is described.
Sentence 5 describes Parmentier setting up heavily guarded potato patches and instructing guards to look the other way when locals tried to steal them, which is a classic example of reverse psychology.
Locating the antecedent for 'This clever reverse-psychology campaign' ensures the narrative flow remains logical.
3
Test the proposed placement to ensure chronological and thematic coherence.
Placing the target sentence at the end of the paragraph (after Sentence 5) allows it to function as a logical conclusion, detailing the success of the campaign described in Sentence 5.
Verifying that the chosen insertion point does not disrupt other parts of the paragraph confirms the correct placement.

Anahtar Kavram

Sentence Reordering and Placement
Tahmini Süre:1m 30s
Soru 1126Soru

For decades, archaeologists assumed that the tiny, white mineral chunks scattered throughout ancient Roman concrete were simply the result of sloppy mixing [1] practices. Consequently, these 'lime clasts' actually serve a vital function: they dissolve when water enters cracks, recrystallizing to seal the damage from within.

Which of the following choices provides the most logical transition between the sentences while maintaining correct sentence structure?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: practices. However, these

Cevap

The option stating 'practices. However, these' is the correct answer because it uses the correct contrast transition to link the two sentences and uses a period to avoid a comma splice.
The correct choice is the one that uses the transition word 'However' to signal contrast and a period to separate the two independent clauses. The passage contrasts the initial assumption that the mineral chunks were the result of sloppy mixing with the discovery that they serve a vital self-healing function.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the logical relationship between the first sentence and the second sentence.
The first sentence describes an assumption of poor mixing ('sloppy mixing practices'), while the second sentence reveals a beneficial function ('serve a vital function'). This requires a transition of contrast (such as 'however'), not cause-and-effect ('consequently').
Identifying the correct relationship allows us to eliminate choices that use incorrect transitions.
2
Evaluate the grammatical structure of the sentence with the correct transition.
Both 'For decades... practices' and 'these lime clasts... within' are independent clauses. Joining them with a comma and the conjunctive adverb 'however' creates a comma splice.
Semicolons or periods must be used to separate independent clauses when connected by conjunctive adverbs like 'however'.
3
Select the option that features the correct logical transition and proper punctuation.
The option 'practices. However, these' correctly uses a period to separate the clauses and 'However' to show contrast.
This satisfies both the logical cohesion and the grammatical rules of the sentence.

Anahtar Kavram

Sentence-Level Transitions
Soru 1127Soru

For decades, scientists struggled to explain how geckos could effortlessly scale smooth vertical walls and even walk upside down on polished glass ceilings. Traditional hypotheses involving sticky secretions or microscopic suction cups were repeatedly disproven. It was not until the early 2000s2000\text{s} that researchers confirmed that the gecko's grip relies on van der Waals forces—weak electromagnetic attractions between molecules. This phenomenon is facilitated by millions of microscopic hair-like structures called setae branching into even smaller spatulae, which conform so closely to the surface that they create a molecular bond. [1] However, this adhesion is not permanent; by changing the angle of their toes, geckos can instantly break these bonds to take another step.

The writer wants to add a sentence at Point [1] that provides a concrete, quantitative illustration of the immense strength of these combined molecular forces to emphasize how powerful this microscopic mechanism is. Which choice most effectively accomplishes this goal?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: The cumulative effect of these millions of microscopic contact points is so powerful that, if fully engaged, the forces could support a load of up to 280 pounds280\text{ pounds}.

Cevap

The correct choice is the sentence that states the cumulative effect of the microscopic contact points is so powerful that they could support a load of up to 280 pounds280\text{ pounds}.
The correct choice is the sentence stating that the cumulative effect of the microscopic contact points is so powerful that they could support a load of up to 280 pounds280\text{ pounds}. This option directly satisfies the writer's goal of providing a concrete, quantitative illustration of strength (using the specific figure of 280 pounds280\text{ pounds}) while remaining grammatically correct.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the rhetorical goal specified in the prompt.
The prompt requires a sentence that provides a concrete, quantitative illustration of the strength of the combined molecular forces to emphasize their power.
This establishes the precise criteria that the correct choice must meet.
2
Evaluate each option against the rhetorical goal.
Only the option mentioning the ability to support a load of up to 280 pounds280\text{ pounds} provides a concrete, quantitative illustration of the force's strength. The option detailing the 200 nanometers200\text{ nanometers} width describes size, the option mentioning surface area describes physical space, and the option discussing individual attractions lacks a quantitative measure.
This filters out choices that do not satisfy the writer's specific rhetorical goals.
3
Evaluate the grammatical correctness of the choices.
The correct option is a complete, grammatically sound sentence. The other options introduce grammatical or punctuation errors: one is a sentence fragment starting with a subordinating conjunction, another is a comma splice, and the last incorrectly uses a semicolon after a dependent clause.
This confirms that the chosen option meets both rhetorical and grammatical standards.

Anahtar Kavram

Fulfilling Specific Rhetorical and Writing Goals
Tahmini Süre:1m 30s
Soru 1128Soru

For centuries, stained glass windows have been used to tell stories and bring vibrant color to places of worship. During the Gothic period, medieval artists created these windows by mixing metallic oxides into molten glass. Copper was added to make red or blue glass, while cobalt yielded a deep, rich blue. [1] Modern stained glass artists often use copper foil to wrap individual pieces of glass before soldering them together. Today, these historical windows are carefully preserved, allowing modern viewers to appreciate their beauty and narrative power.

The writer is considering deleting Sentence 1 from the paragraph. Should the sentence be kept or deleted?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Deleted, because it introduces details about modern craft techniques that interrupt the paragraph's focus on medieval stained glass.

Cevap

The sentence should be deleted because it introduces details about modern craft techniques that interrupt the paragraph's focus on medieval stained glass.
The correct answer states that the sentence should be deleted because it introduces details about modern craft techniques that interrupt the paragraph's focus on medieval stained glass. This is correct because the rest of the paragraph describes the history, chemistry, and preservation of medieval stained glass. Introducing a detail about modern soldering and copper foil disrupts the historical narrative.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the main topic of the paragraph.
The paragraph focuses on the history, creation methods, and preservation of medieval stained glass windows.
To determine if Sentence 1 is relevant, we must first establish the central theme of the surrounding text.
2
Analyze the content and purpose of Sentence 1.
Sentence 1 discusses modern stained glass artists and their use of copper foil and soldering.
To compare the sentence's content against the paragraph's central focus.
3
Evaluate whether the sentence should be kept or deleted.
The sentence is off-topic and interrupts the historical flow, so it should be deleted.
Sentences that deviate from the main focus of a passage should be removed to maintain unity.

Anahtar Kavram

Evaluating the relevance of a sentence to maintain paragraph unity and cohesion
Tahmini Süre:45s
Soru 1129Soru

The writer wants to arrange the following sentences to logically trace how a highly classified military surveillance technology unexpectedly became an invaluable tool for marine biologists. What is the most logical order for these sentences?

Öğeleri doğru sıraya koymak için sürükleyin

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap

The most logical order is to start with the introduction of SOSUS, followed by the detection of mysterious sounds, then the transition when scientists were granted access to the classified recordings, and finally the discovery that the signals were whale songs.
The correct order follows a clear chronological and logical progression. First, the Sound Surveillance System (SOSUS) is introduced along with its military purpose. Second, the text explains that these underwater hydrophones ('these sensitive listening posts') picked up mysterious hums. Third, it recounts that these audio files ('these recordings') were classified until the late 1980s when scientists were given access. Finally, it describes the outcome of that access: biologists identifying the signals as whale songs, which fulfills the rhetorical goal.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the introductory sentence.
The sentence introducing the Sound Surveillance System (SOSUS) in the 1950s serves as the logical starting point, as it provides the necessary context and defines the technology without relying on preceding information.
An introductory sentence must establish the topic independently.
2
Link the second sentence using pronoun/demonstrative references.
The sentence beginning with 'these sensitive listening posts' must follow the introduction because 'listening posts' refers back to the 'underwater hydrophones' in the introduction.
Cohesive markers like 'these' require an antecedent in the previous sentence.
3
Connect the next chronological development.
The sentence noting that 'these recordings' remained classified before being shared in the 1980s follows, as 'these recordings' refers to the 'strange, low-frequency hums' picked up by the listening posts.
This establishes the transition of the data from military classification to civilian scientific access.
4
Determine the concluding resolution.
The sentence explaining that biologists recognized 'these mystery signals' as whale songs resolves the narrative by showing the outcome of scientific access.
This completes the rhetorical goal of explaining how submarine surveillance tech became a tool for marine biology.

Anahtar Kavram

Logical sentence sequencing using reference words (pronouns, demonstratives) and narrative structure to achieve specific rhetorical goals.
Soru 1130Soru

The following paragraphs are from a draft of an essay about the London Underground map. Arrange the paragraphs in the most logical order to create a cohesive essay.

Öğeleri doğru sıraya koymak için sürükleyin

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap

The correct paragraph order is: the paragraph starting with 'In the early twentieth century...', followed by the paragraph starting with 'An engineering draftsman named Harry Beck...', then the paragraph starting with 'In 1931, Beck submitted...', and concluding with the paragraph starting with 'This overwhelming success...'.
The correct order follows a logical progression from problem to solution, followed by testing and long-term legacy. The first paragraph introduces the problem of the early London Underground map's geographical clutter. The second paragraph introduces Harry Beck and his circuit-inspired solution, referencing 'this geographical accuracy' from the first paragraph. The third paragraph details the 1931 submission of 'his radical new design' and the subsequent successful trial run. The fourth paragraph concludes the essay by referencing 'This overwhelming success' and describing the map's lasting legacy.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the introductory paragraph.
The paragraph describing the initial geographic chaos of the early twentieth-century London Underground map must come first.
It establishes the historical context and the problem that the essay's subject (Harry Beck) will solve.
2
Connect the introduction to the developer of the map.
The paragraph introducing Harry Beck and his circuit-diagram concept must follow the introduction.
It uses the demonstrative phrase 'this geographical accuracy' to refer directly back to the physical sprawl and station clustering described in the first paragraph.
3
Trace the chronological progression of the map's submission.
The paragraph detailing the 1931 submission and the 1933 trial print run must come third.
It chronologically follows the creation of the design described in the second paragraph and uses 'his radical new design' to refer to that concept.
4
Identify the conclusion.
The paragraph discussing the map's massive success and lasting global legacy must be the final paragraph.
It begins with 'This overwhelming success,' which links directly back to the sold-out trial run in the third paragraph, and summarizes the long-term impact.

Anahtar Kavram

Identifying transition words, pronoun-antecedent links, and chronological progression to logically order paragraphs.
Tahmini Süre:2m 0s
Soru 1131Soru

Each spring, maple syrup producers in New England harvest sap from sugar maple trees. To do this, they drill small holes into the tree trunks and insert metal or plastic taps called spiles. Sap, which is mostly water with a low sugar content, drips slowly from these spiles into hanging buckets or plastic tubing. *Sugar maple trees can grow up to eighty feet tall and live for over three hundred years.* This harvested sap is then collected and boiled in large pans inside a sugarhouse. Boiling evaporates the excess water, concentrating the sugars until it becomes the thick, sweet syrup enjoyed on pancakes and waffles.

The writer is considering deleting the italicized sentence from the passage. Should the sentence be kept or deleted?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Deleted, because it interrupts the paragraph's discussion of the process of harvesting and refining maple sap with unrelated facts about the tree's size and lifespan.

Cevap

The sentence should be deleted because it interrupts the paragraph's discussion of the process of harvesting and refining maple sap with unrelated facts about the tree's size and lifespan.
The correct answer is the option suggesting the sentence be deleted because it interrupts the paragraph's explanation of the process of harvesting and processing maple sap. The paragraph is structured to describe the steps of making syrup, and details about the physical size and age of the trees do not support this description.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the focus of the surrounding paragraph.
The paragraph details the chronological sequence of maple syrup production: tapping trees, collecting sap, and boiling it to evaporate water.
Identifying the paragraph's main theme allows you to evaluate whether the sentence in question contributes to that theme.
2
Evaluate the relevance of the italicized sentence.
The sentence describes how tall sugar maple trees grow and how long they live.
This step determines whether the information about the tree's growth and lifespan fits the step-by-step process of syrup production.
3
Determine the correct action and justification.
Since the sentence interrupts the flow of the process description with tangential information, it should be deleted. The justification stating that it interrupts the process of harvesting and refining sap is the correct choice.
This completes the evaluation by aligning the decision to delete with the logical reason that the sentence is off-topic.

Anahtar Kavram

Evaluating sentence relevance to maintain paragraph unity and cohesion.
Tahmini Süre:50s
Soru 1132Soru

During her trip to the local botanical garden, Sarah spent several hours observing the orchids, which she noted were currently blooming at this present time.

Which choice most effectively minimizes redundancy in the underlined portion of the sentence?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: blooming

Cevap

The correct answer is 'blooming', as it is the most concise choice that avoids redundancy and maintains grammatical correctness.
The option containing only 'blooming' is correct because it is the most concise choice and avoids redundant language while keeping the sentence grammatically sound.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify repetitive or redundant words in the original sentence.
The words 'currently' and 'at this present time' express the exact same concept of happening in the present moment.
Redundant synonyms must be removed to ensure clear and concise writing.
2
Evaluate the remaining options for both conciseness and grammatical correctness.
The single word 'blooming' eliminates the repetition while fitting the grammatical structure of the sentence. The other options either maintain the redundancy, introduce a comma splice, or create a sentence fragment.
The correct choice must improve conciseness without introducing new grammatical errors.

Anahtar Kavram

Eliminating Redundancy
Tahmini Süre:45s
Soru 1133Soru

Deep in the Mariana Trench, the Mariana snailfish thrives under extreme pressure that would easily crush most other marine organisms, due to the fact that it has bones that are flexible and cartilage-like.

Which of the following is the most concise and grammatically correct replacement for the underlined portion?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: organisms because it has

Cevap

organisms because it has
The correct option is the most concise and direct phrasing that maintains the meaning of the sentence without introducing any grammatical or punctuation errors.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the wordiness in the original sentence.
The phrase 'due to the fact that it has' is wordy and can be simplified to a direct conjunction.
ACT English style requires avoiding excessive words when a simpler, more direct phrasing is available.
2
Check the remaining choices for grammatical correctness.
The option that removes the conjunction entirely creates a comma splice, and the option with extra commas violates correct punctuation rules by separating the verb from its direct object.
Eliminating wordiness must not introduce new grammatical errors.

Anahtar Kavram

Eliminating Wordiness
Soru 1134Soru

The following is an excerpt from an essay about the history of astronomy.

In the early twentieth century, the Harvard College Observatory employed a group of women, colloquially known as the "Harvard Computers," to analyze astronomical data on photographic plates. Among them was Henrietta Swan Leavitt, whose study of Cepheid variable stars would fundamentally alter our understanding of the universe.

[1] __________________________________________________ Prior to her discovery, astronomers had no reliable way to measure the distance to faraway stars, leaving the scale of the cosmos a subject of intense debate. By establishing that a star's brightness was directly related to its pulsation period, Leavitt provided the essential tool that Edwin Hubble later used to prove that galaxies exist beyond our own.

Which choice most effectively introduces the paragraph by establishing its main focus?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Leavitt discovered a mathematical relationship between the luminosity and the pulsation period of Cepheid variables.

Cevap

Leavitt discovered a mathematical relationship between the luminosity and the pulsation period of Cepheid variables.
The correct choice must establish a clear introduction to the paragraph's main focus. The option that describes Leavitt discovering a mathematical relationship between the luminosity and pulsation period of Cepheid variables is grammatically correct and directly sets up the main topic of the paragraph. It also provides the necessary antecedent for the phrase 'her discovery' in the following sentence, which explains how astronomers measured distances to stars.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Read the paragraph and analyze the sentence immediately following the blank to identify what information is introduced.
The subsequent sentence mentions 'Prior to her discovery, astronomers had no reliable way to measure the distance to faraway stars,' indicating that the blank must introduce a scientific discovery related to stellar measurement.
To establish a coherent introduction, the missing sentence must provide a logical transition and direct context for the details that follow it.
2
Evaluate each answer choice for grammatical correctness and relevance to the paragraph's main focus.
The option describing Leavitt's discovery of a mathematical relationship is grammatically correct and contextually appropriate. The option starting with 'Because' is a fragment. The option using a semicolon before a participle is a punctuation error. The option with 'compensation... were' contains a subject-verb agreement error and is off-topic.
ACT English questions require sentences to be both grammatically correct and rhetorically effective.

Anahtar Kavram

Establishing Introductions and Thesis Statements
Tahmini Süre:1m 0s
Soru 1135Soru

[1] In 1911, the Italian archaeologist Luigi Pernier discovered the Phaistos Disc in the ruins of a Minoan palace in Crete. [2] The clay disc, covered on both sides with a spiral of stamped symbols, remains one of archaeology’s most famous undeciphered mysteries. [3] Many scholars have tried to decode the 242 signs, which feature representations of human figures, animals, and plants. [4] Some researchers suggest the disc records a sacred hymn, while others argue it is a legal document or a board game. [5] Because the symbols are stamped rather than hand-carved, the disc represents an early precursor to movable type printing, developed thousands of years before Johannes Gutenberg's press.

Given the passage above, the writer is considering adding the following sentence to the end of the paragraph:

"Gutenberg's invention of the printing press in fifteenth-century Germany revolutionized the dissemination of knowledge across Europe."

Should the writer make this addition?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: No, because it introduces a topic—the historical impact of Gutenberg’s press—that deviates from the paragraph's primary focus on the Phaistos Disc.

Cevap

The writer should not add the sentence because it introduces a topic (the historical impact of Gutenberg's press) that deviates from the paragraph's primary focus on the Phaistos Disc.
The correct choice correctly identifies that the proposed sentence should not be added because it introduces a new topic—the impact of Gutenberg's press—which is irrelevant to the paragraph's main focus on the Phaistos Disc.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the main topic and focus of the existing paragraph.
The paragraph describes the discovery of the Phaistos Disc, its undeciphered symbols, and its status as an early precursor to movable type printing.
To determine if the proposed sentence is relevant, we must first establish the paragraph's central theme.
2
Evaluate the content of the proposed sentence.
The proposed sentence details how Gutenberg's press revolutionized the dissemination of knowledge in Europe.
This allows us to compare the proposed sentence's content with the paragraph's established theme.
3
Determine whether the proposed sentence contributes to the paragraph's focus or diverges from it.
Although Gutenberg is mentioned in the final sentence of the paragraph, expanding on the societal impact of his press shifts the focus away from the Phaistos Disc.
In ACT English, additions that introduce off-topic information should be rejected, even if they have a loose connection (surface relevance) to a word in the passage.

Anahtar Kavram

Evaluating relevance when making sentence addition decisions
Soru 1136Soru

[1] In the late 1980s, engineering teams in Japan faced a daunting challenge with the high-speed Shinkansen trains. As the trains exited narrow tunnels at speeds of nearly 200 miles per hour, they compressed the air ahead of them, creating a deafening sound known as a "tunnel boom." This noise not only disturbed nearby residents but also threatened the structural integrity of the tunnels themselves. Eiji Nakatsu, the chief engineer and an avid birdwatcher, realized that the solution might lie in nature.

[2] Nakatsu observed the kingfisher, a bird that dives from the air into water to catch fish with barely a splash. He reasoned that the bird's wedge-shaped beak allowed it to transition smoothly between mediums of different densities. By redesigning the nose of the Shinkansen train to mimic the shape of the kingfisher's beak, the engineers reduced the train's air pressure by 30 percent and noise levels significantly. ________

Which of the following concluding sentences best wraps up the main idea of the passage?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Ultimately, this application of biomimicry not only resolved the acoustic issue but also improved the train’s overall aerodynamic efficiency.

Cevap

Ultimately, this application of biomimicry not only resolved the acoustic issue but also improved the train’s overall aerodynamic efficiency.
The correct answer, which discusses how biomimicry solved the acoustic issue and improved aerodynamic efficiency, is correct because it logically concludes the paragraph by summarizing the resolution of the main challenge (noise and pressure) using the biological concept introduced in the text, all while maintaining grammatical correctness and consistent tense.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the passage to identify the central focus and theme.
The passage describes how Japanese engineers solved a specific problem (tunnel boom noise and high air pressure in Shinkansen trains) by mimicking the shape of a kingfisher's beak (biomimicry).
Understanding the core topic prevents choosing options that drift into unrelated concepts.
2
Evaluate the grammar and structure of each option.
Identify that the option containing a comma splice is grammatically incorrect, and the option with the future tense shift is inconsistent with the historical context of the passage.
ACT English questions require sentences to be both rhetorically effective and grammatically correct.
3
Determine which grammatically correct option best summarizes the passage without introducing new details.
The option highlighting that the biomimicry design resolved the acoustic issue and improved aerodynamic efficiency correctly summarizes the train's design changes without introducing external details about other vehicles or animals.
An effective conclusion must wrap up the main ideas of the passage rather than introduce new research directions.

Anahtar Kavram

Selecting Concluding Sentences
Soru 1137Soru

Passage:
In 1957, engineers Alfred Fielding and Marc Chavannes sealed two plastic shower curtains together, trapping pockets of air between them. They hoped this textured material would become a popular new home wallpaper. [1] Therefore, consumers showed little interest in decorating their walls with plastic sheets. The inventors did not despair; instead, they successfully marketed their product as 'Bubble Wrap' for protective packaging.

Question:
Which choice provides the most logical transition at [1]?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: However,

Cevap

The transition word 'However,' which correctly establishes a relationship of contrast.
The transition word 'However,' is correct because it signals contrast. The passage sets up an expectation in the first sentence (the hope that the plastic material would become popular wallpaper) and contrasts it with reality in the second sentence (consumers showed little interest).

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the relationship between the two connected sentences.
Sentence 1 describes a positive expectation (hoping the material would become popular wallpaper). Sentence 2 describes a negative reality (consumers showing little interest).
Understanding the logic linking the ideas is necessary to choose the correct transition.
2
Identify the type of transition needed.
A contrast transition is needed to connect a positive expectation with a negative outcome.
Selecting the right logical category (contrast, addition, cause-effect, illustration) narrows down the choices.
3
Evaluate the choices to find the one that fits this transition type.
The word 'However' indicates contrast and fits the context. The others (Therefore, Furthermore, For instance) indicate cause-and-effect, addition, and illustration respectively.
Matching the transition category with the correct vocabulary word yields the right answer.

Anahtar Kavram

Sentence-level transitions signal the logical relationships between ideas in consecutive sentences.
Soru 1138Soru

The following passage is about the early history of color photography:

In the early 1900s, chemist and photographer Sergey Prokudin-Gorsky embarked on a monumental project to document the vast Russian Empire. Recognizing that traditional black-and-white photography failed to capture the vibrant cultures and diverse landscapes of the region, he developed a specialized camera. This camera rapidly exposed three black-and-white glass plates through red, green, and blue filters. By projecting these plates using three corresponding light sources, he reconstructed full-color images. [1] The Tsar, Nicholas II, was so impressed by a demonstration of these images that he provided Prokudin-Gorsky with a specially equipped railroad car darkroom and the necessary travel permits to document the empire.

The writer wants to add a sentence at Point [1] that highlights the groundbreaking nature of Prokudin-Gorsky’s technological achievement before explaining the Tsar's reaction. Which choice most effectively fulfills this goal?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: This ingenious process yielded remarkably vivid, full-color photographs decades before color film became commercially available.

Cevap

This ingenious process yielded remarkably vivid, full-color photographs decades before color film became commercially available.
The correct option is grammatically correct and directly satisfies the writer's goal of highlighting the pioneering and groundbreaking nature of Prokudin-Gorsky's technology. By noting that this process achieved full-color photos decades before commercial color film, it emphasizes the advanced state of his technology.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the prompt to identify the specific rhetorical goal.
The goal is to highlight the groundbreaking nature of the color photography technology at Point [1].
This establishes the criteria for the correct choice.
2
Evaluate the grammar of each option.
The option beginning with 'His method was entirely unique' is a comma splice, and the option starting with 'Because he hoped' is a fragment, eliminating both on grammatical grounds.
ACT English requires all correct choices to be grammatically correct.
3
Compare the remaining grammatically correct options against the rhetorical goal.
The option about the process yielding images decades before commercial color film highlights technological innovation. The option about traveling thousands of miles focuses on logistics and physical effort, not technology.
The correct choice must satisfy the specific prompt criteria rather than general relevance.

Anahtar Kavram

Fulfilling Specific Rhetorical and Writing Goals
Tahmini Süre:1m 0s
Soru 1139Soru

Passage Excerpt:
In the early 1900s, botanist Ynes Mexia began her career in Mexico. She traveled across the rugged terrain of the Americas, collecting thousands of plant specimens. [1] Many of these specimens were later housed in herbariums around the world.

The writer wants to replace the sentence at [1] with a sentence that highlights the physical difficulties of Mexia's expeditions. Given that all the statements are true, which choice best accomplishes this goal?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: She scaled active volcanoes and braved dense jungles to gather rare species.

Cevap

The sentence 'She scaled active volcanoes and braved dense jungles to gather rare species.' is the correct choice because it is grammatically correct and directly describes the physical challenges of Mexia's expeditions.
The correct choice is the sentence that describes the physical challenges Mexia encountered, such as climbing active volcanoes and navigating dense jungles, while maintaining proper grammar.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the rhetorical goal specified in the prompt.
The prompt asks for a sentence that highlights the physical difficulties of Mexia's expeditions.
This establishes the criteria for evaluating the choices based on their content.
2
Evaluate the choices for grammatical correctness.
The option containing 'She traveled to remote areas, she braved dense jungles' is ungrammatical because of a comma splice. The remaining options are grammatically correct.
Eliminating grammatically incorrect options is a standard first step in ACT English questions.
3
Compare the grammatically correct options against the rhetorical goal.
The option about cataloging specimens and the option about daisies do not describe physical difficulties. Only the option describing scaling active volcanoes and braving dense jungles fulfills this criteria.
This selects the option that fulfills both the grammatical and rhetorical requirements of the prompt.

Anahtar Kavram

Meeting Specific Rhetorical Goals
Tahmini Süre:1m 0s
Soru 1140Soru

[1] At the ancient Mayan city of Chichen Itza, the pyramid known as El Castillo displays a remarkable acoustic phenomenon. [2] When a visitor claps their hands at the base of the staircase, the echo returning from the temple at the summit sounds uncannily like the chirp of the resplendent quetzal, a bird sacred to the Maya. [3] Some archaeologists argue that this acoustic effect was intentional, engineered by Mayan architects to evoke the voice of their deities during ceremonies. [4] The quetzal was highly valued for its vibrant green tail feathers, which were used to make elaborate headdresses for royalty. [5] Skeptics, however, maintain that the chirp is merely an accidental byproduct of the staircase's stair-step geometry.

The writer is considering deleting Sentence 4 from the preceding paragraph. Should this sentence be kept or deleted?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Deleted, because it introduces details about the quetzal's feathers that are irrelevant to the paragraph's discussion of the pyramid's acoustic properties.

Cevap

Deleted, because it introduces details about the quetzal's feathers that are irrelevant to the paragraph's discussion of the pyramid's acoustic properties.
The correct option correctly states that Sentence 4 should be deleted because it introduces details about the quetzal's feathers that are irrelevant to the paragraph's discussion of the pyramid's acoustic properties.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the main topic and focus of the paragraph.
The paragraph discusses the acoustic echo at El Castillo pyramid that mimics a quetzal chirp, and the debate over whether this effect was intentional or accidental.
Establishing the paragraph's primary topic is necessary to evaluate if the sentence in question supports or deviates from this focus.
2
Analyze the content and purpose of Sentence 4.
Sentence 4 states that the quetzal was valued for its feathers, which were used to make elaborate headdresses for royalty.
Analyzing the specific details of the sentence helps determine if it contributes to the discussion of acoustics or introduces irrelevant information.
3
Evaluate the deletion decision based on the relevance of the sentence.
Because details about royal headdresses do not relate to the acoustic echo or architectural engineering of the pyramid, the sentence should be deleted.
Removing irrelevant information maintains the unity and cohesion of the paragraph, leading to the correct choice.

Anahtar Kavram

Sentence Addition and Deletion Decisions
Tahmini Süre:1m 30s
ÖncekiSayfa 57 / 278Sonraki
Tüm alıştırma soruları — ACT | Examkin