Read the following excerpt from a colonial statute enacted in South Carolina in 1740:
"And whereas, the having of slaves taught to write, or suffering them to be employed in writing, may be attended with great inconveniences; Be it therefore enacted, That all and every person and persons whatsoever, who shall hereafter teach or cause any slave or slaves to be taught to write... shall, for every such offense, forfeit the sum of one hundred pounds current money."
Which of the following historical developments best explains the inclusion of this specific provision in South Carolina’s slave code?
- AThe instantaneous codification of racial chattel slavery immediately following the arrival of the first Africans in 1619, which prohibited literacy from the outset of British colonization.
- BThe enforcement of the doctrine of partus sequitur ventrem, which legally mandated that literacy restrictions be passed down through the maternal line to determine labor status.
- The colonial assembly's reaction to the Stono Rebellion, which prompted legislators to restrict literacy to prevent the coordination of future armed uprisings.Cevap
- DA response to a sudden British imperial mandate that standardized slave codes across all colonies in 1619, eliminating early regional legal differences in enslaved people's education.
Cevap
The colonial assembly's reaction to the Stono Rebellion, which prompted legislators to restrict literacy to prevent the coordination of future armed uprisings.
The correct answer is correct because the South Carolina Negro Act of 1740 was a direct legislative response to the Stono Rebellion of 1739. Colonial authorities believed that literacy facilitated the planning and execution of the rebellion by allowing conspirators to communicate, coordinate, and forge travel passes. Consequently, the act prohibited teaching enslaved people to write to minimize the threat of future organized uprisings.
Adım Adım Çözüm
Anahtar Kavram
The Legal Construction of Slavery and Slave Codes