"The women and children, who are not kept in irons, are often the instruments of these insurrections, by conveying files, knives, or other weapons, to the men, or by giving them intelligence of the ship's watch."
—Surgeon John Atkins, A Voyage to Guinea, Brasil, and the West-Indies, 1721
Which of the following historical conclusions about Middle Passage resistance is best supported by the excerpt?
- ADiverse linguistic and cultural backgrounds forced captives to rely solely on individualized resistance, preventing cross-gender coordination on voyages.
- BShipboard mutinies were rare, isolated incidents that occurred primarily due to lapses in crew vigilance rather than organized planning by captives.
- The gender-segregated structure of captivity enabled women to act as essential coordinators and couriers, subverting shipboard surveillance to facilitate collective revolts.Cevap
- DEnslaved women limited their resistance to covert, non-violent acts on deck, leaving the planning and execution of physical mutinies entirely to male captives.
Cevap
The gender-segregated structure of captivity enabled women to act as essential coordinators and couriers, subverting shipboard surveillance to facilitate collective revolts.
The correct option is correct because the gender-segregated confinement policies of slave ships—where women were frequently left unchained on deck—unintentionally provided women captives with the mobility needed to act as key organizers, gather intelligence, and supply weapons to the chained male captives below deck. This demonstrates that Middle Passage resistance was highly coordinated and shaped by the gendered dynamics of captivity.
Adım Adım Çözüm
Anahtar Kavram
The gendered dimensions of shipboard captivity and how women captives organized and facilitated Middle Passage resistance.
Tahmini Süre:3m 0s