Etruscan temple architecture, as described by Vitruvius and reconstructed from archaeological evidence, differed significantly from Greek temple architecture in its structural materials and layout. While Greek builders increasingly favored stone, Etruscans constructed their temple superstructures primarily of wood and mudbrick, incorporating terracotta decoration. The use of these lighter, non-stone materials in the superstructure of Etruscan temples directly allowed for which of the following architectural design choices?
- AA continuous colonnade (peristyle) surrounding the building to distribute the massive load of the pediment.
- Widely spaced columns (intercolumniation) along the porch, creating a deep, open entrance area.Cevap
- CThe incorporation of load-bearing stone barrel vaults to support a vaulted roof over a triple cella.
- DA low, multi-stepped platform (stylobate) that allowed worshippers to enter the temple from any direction.
Cevap
Widely spaced columns (intercolumniation) along the porch, creating a deep, open entrance area.
The correct option is correct because the use of lightweight wooden beams and clay tiles for the superstructure of Etruscan temples exerted far less downward and outward pressure than the massive stone architraves of Greek temples. This structural difference allowed Etruscan builders to place their columns much further apart (wider intercolumniation) without risking structural failure, directly facilitating the creation of a deep, open porch.
Adım Adım Çözüm
Anahtar Kavram
Etruscan Temple Architecture and Materials
Tahmini Süre:2m 0s