(1) I must admit, Mr. Sterling is a man of singularly narrow horizons, a fact that became
(2) painfully obvious during our first discussion regarding his son's education. He sat
(3) in his leather-bound chair, clutching a ledger as though it were holy scripture, and
(4) spoke only of arithmetic and ledger-entries, entirely dismissing the classical curriculum
(5) I proposed. "Latin will not buy flour," he remarked with that crude, practical air that
(6) characterizes the mercantile class of our town. I listened with a polite, if strained,
(7) smile, pitying a mind so utterly blind to the finer textures of human thought. He
(8) believes himself a benefactor, ensuring his son's future, yet he is merely building a
(9) gilded cage of numbers. Later, when the boy struggled to translate a simple passage of
(10) Virgil, Mr. Sterling entered the study and patted the child's shoulder, murmuring that
(11) a ledger requires no translation. It is clear to any detached observer that the man
(12) fears his son might outshine him, and thus actively seeks to suppress the boy's natural
(13) intellectual curiosity under the guise of practical guidance.
The narrator's explanation of Mr. Sterling's behavior in lines 11–13 ('It is clear... guidance') reveals a bias that is primarily rooted in which of the following?
- The narrator's own intellectual arrogance and class-based condescension, which prevent him from recognizing Mr. Sterling's genuine parental concernCevap
- BAn accurate, objective recognition of Mr. Sterling's underlying desire to prevent his son from achieving academic success
- CA shared philosophical alignment with the author's disdain for the pragmatic values of the rising mercantile class
- DThe narrator's deep resentment over Mr. Sterling's constant interruptions and his refusal to pay the agreed-upon tutoring wages
- EAn omniscient, third-person perspective that remains detached from the emotional dynamics of the household