Read the following passage:
For years, Clara had treated translation as an act of preservation through sanitization. She smoothed the rough-hewn prose of foreign dissidents into the polished, polite syntax expected by metropolitan journals, convinced she was rescuing their ideas from the distorting heat of their own fury. But standing before the exiled writer in the terminal—his coat threadbare, his gestures raw and jagged with an urgency her translation had entirely planished away—she felt the neat architecture of her prose collapse. His speech did not seek her elegant cadences; it demanded the rough, unadorned corners she had spent a career rounding off. Back at her desk, she deleted the clean draft and began again, leaving the awkward repetitions and fractured syntax intact.
Which of the following best describes how the contrast between the writer's visceral presence and Clara's translation work functions to reveal a shift in Clara's values?
- It exposes the sterility of her previous aesthetic standards, prompting her to prioritize authentic emotional vulnerability over formal elegance.Cevap
- BIt chronicles the physical journey of the exiled writer from his native country to his arrival at the metropolitan terminal.
- CIt validates Clara's initial conviction that translating dissident writing requires filtering out raw anger to preserve its intellectual merit.
- DIt expresses the author's direct criticism of metropolitan journals for their refusal to publish raw or unconventional translation styles.