Read the following passage carefully:
Miriam held her breath as the cotton swab, moistened with solvent, touched the darkened varnish of the portrait. Underneath the centuries of grime, a sliver of brilliant cobalt blue emerged—the edge of a sleeve, perhaps, or a portion of the sky. To Miriam, this small revelation was not merely a professional success; it was a vindication of her suspicion that the painting had been misattributed. The museum's curators had insisted the work was by a minor student of the master, citing the stiffness of the hands. Yet Miriam felt, with an intensity that bordered on the religious, that no minor student could have captured the luminous texture of that blue. Her eyes scanned the rest of the canvas, searching for further clues, while the low hum of the air conditioner in the basement laboratory seemed to mark the passage of hours she had completely lost track of. She knew she was risking her reputation by delaying the cataloging, but the painting seemed to whisper to her of a hidden genius that only she possessed the patience to uncover.
Based on the passage, the third-person limited point of view functions primarily to do which of the following?
- align the reader with Miriam's intense subjective conviction, highlighting her isolation from the curators' consensusCevap
- Bsuggest that the author shares Miriam's disdain for the museum's bureaucratic curators
- Cdemonstrate that Miriam's belief about the painting's hidden genius is an objective and undeniable truth
- Dprovide a detailed chronological catalog of the restoration process and the tools used in the laboratory
- Eindicate that the narrator is an omniscient observer who can verify the true historical origin of the painting