Examkin

Soru

Zorluk: KolayCorroborating Claims Across Sources

A student is reviewing two sources regarding an urban agriculture initiative in Rosario, Argentina:

Source 1 (Excerpt from a radio interview with the project coordinator):
"When we started the neighborhood garden project two years ago, our primary hope was to give families direct access to fresh produce. Today, families who cultivate plots regularly tell us that their weekly food spending has noticeably dropped, which provides meaningful financial relief."

Source 2 (Excerpt from a municipal report on community development):
"Data collected from participating households in the Rosario urban garden network shows an average 18% reduction in monthly grocery expenses. Additionally, surveys indicate that neighborhood cohesion has improved as residents share daily gardening tasks."

Based on the information provided in both sources, which claim is corroborated by both the radio interview and the municipal report?

  1. A
    The primary objective of the initiative was to train residents for technical agricultural employment.
  2. The urban agriculture project helped participating families lower their food expenses.Cevap
  3. C
    The municipal government mandated garden participation for all neighborhood households.
  4. D
    The project coordinator expressed doubt regarding whether community gardens provide meaningful relief.

Cevap

The urban agriculture project helped participating families lower their food expenses.
The correct answer accurately synthesizes evidence from both sources. In the radio interview, the coordinator highlights that families report their weekly food spending has noticeably dropped, while the municipal report provides supporting quantitative data demonstrating an average 18% reduction in grocery expenses.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the key claim made in the first source (radio interview).
The coordinator states that weekly food spending has noticeably dropped for participating families.
Establishing the core factual assertion from the audio transcript is the first step in cross-source corroboration.
2
Identify the key claim made in the second source (municipal report).
The report documents an average 18% reduction in monthly grocery expenses among participating households.
Extracting the matching finding from the print text enables comparison across both sources.
3
Synthesize findings to determine the common corroborated claim.
Both sources confirm that participants experienced reduced household food costs.
Corroboration requires finding an agreement or shared piece of evidence between both independent accounts.

Anahtar Kavram

Corroborating Claims Across Sources
Tahmini Süre:45s
Bu soruyu puanla

Konular

Corroborating Claims Across Sources

Bu konudan daha fazla soru