Examkin

Soru

Zorluk: OrtaDistinguishing Fact from Opinion and Bias

The following passage is an English translation of an editorial from a Peruvian newspaper regarding the restoration of waru waru, a pre-Columbian agricultural technique, in the Puno region:

"For centuries, the indigenous communities of the Andean altiplano successfully cultivated crops under extreme weather conditions using waru waru—raised agricultural platforms surrounded by water channels. Recently, local non-governmental organizations funded the reconstruction of 120 hectares of these fields in Puno, and municipal records show that potato yields in these plots increased by 30 percent compared to standard regional farms during the last drought. Regrettably, modern state agricultural policies continue to favor intensive, chemical-dependent farming models, showing an inexcusable disregard for ancestral wisdom. While some agronomists argue that waru waru is too labor-intensive for widespread commercial use, it remains the only truly sustainable and culturally respectful path forward for Andean agriculture. The state must immediately redirect its rural development budget to scale this ancient technology. Only by embracing our past can we hope to secure a resilient food system for future generations."

Based on the editorial, which of the following statements represents a subjective opinion of the author rather than a verifiable fact?

  1. State agricultural policies show an inexcusable disregard for ancestral wisdom.Cevap
  2. B
    Potato yields in the restored plots increased by 30 percent during the last drought.
  3. C
    Local non-governmental organizations funded the reconstruction of 120 hectares of fields in Puno.
  4. D
    Some agronomists argue that the waru waru method is too labor-intensive for commercial use.

Cevap

State agricultural policies show an inexcusable disregard for ancestral wisdom.
The statement regarding state agricultural policies showing 'inexcusable disregard' is correct because it uses value-laden, emotional language to express the author's subjective judgment. Unlike the other statements, it cannot be objectively proven or disproven.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the question stem to identify what is being asked.
The question asks to identify a subjective opinion of the author rather than a verifiable fact.
This establishes the criteria for evaluating the options by distinguishing value judgments from empirical data.
2
Scan the passage to locate the context of each option and determine if it represents a verifiable fact.
The statements about funding 120 hectares, the 30 percent increase in potato yields, and the arguments of some agronomists are all presented as verifiable historical occurrences or empirical data. The statement about state policies showing 'inexcusable disregard' contains subjective value judgments.
By separating empirical facts from editorial judgments, the subjective statement can be isolated.
3
Evaluate the correct option against the criteria for subjective opinion.
The phrase 'inexcusable disregard' is a subjective value judgment reflecting the author's bias, confirming it is an opinion.
This verifies that the chosen option directly answers the prompt.

Anahtar Kavram

Distinguishing Fact from Opinion and Bias
Bu soruyu puanla

Konular

Distinguishing Fact from Opinion and Bias

Bu konudan daha fazla soru