Soru

Zorluk: Çok zorDemographic Shifts and Sun Belt Migration

Read the following passage and answer the question below:

"The rise of the Sun Belt is often credited to the triumph of the 'rugged individualist' ethos and the appeal of low taxes and right-to-work laws. Yet, this narrative ignores the massive, sustained flow of federal dollars into the region. From defense contracts and aerospace installations during the Cold War to massive water reclamation projects and interstate highway systems, the federal government essentially subsidized the suburban and industrial growth of the South and West. Consequently, the political shift that followed was not merely an organic rejection of the state, but a complex realignment where regions built by federal intervention became the vanguard of a movement dedicated to dismantling it."
—Adapted from historical analyses of post-1980 political geography

The historical interpretation expressed in the excerpt most directly challenges which of the following arguments regarding the political realignment of the Sun Belt post-1980?

  1. A
    The claim that supply-side policies under the Reagan administration stimulated economic growth primarily through massive increases in federal domestic welfare spending.
  2. B
    The claim that the federal projects that built the Sun Belt's infrastructure were primarily authorized under President Franklin D. Roosevelt's New Deal programs to combat the Great Depression.
  3. The claim that the rise of Southern and Western conservatism was an organic, grassroots movement independent of federal economic support.Cevap
  4. D
    The claim that the dissolution of the Soviet Union immediately led to the total economic collapse of the Southern and Western defense-related aerospace industries.

Cevap

The claim that the rise of Southern and Western conservatism was an organic, grassroots movement independent of federal economic support.
The correct answer is correct because the excerpt explicitly argues that the growth and subsequent conservative political realignment of the Sun Belt was not simply an organic, grassroots rejection of federal power, but rather a development heavily subsidized by federal intervention (such as defense projects, aerospace installations, water reclamation, and highways). Therefore, it directly challenges the narrative that this conservative shift was entirely independent of federal economic support.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the provided historical excerpt to identify its main argument.
The author argues that while the rise of the Sun Belt is often attributed to 'rugged individualism' and free enterprise, it was actually heavily subsidized by federal spending (defense contracts, aerospace, water projects, highways).
Understanding the author's core thesis is necessary to identify which counter-argument the excerpt is directly challenging.
2
Identify the historical connection between Sun Belt growth and the political realignment post-1980.
The growth of the Sun Belt shifted demographic and electoral weight to the South and West, helping propel the modern conservative movement into national prominence.
This links the physical migration and demographic shifts to the political realignment mentioned in the question prompt.
3
Evaluate the answer choices to determine which claim is directly contradicted or challenged by the excerpt.
The claim that the conservative rise in the South and West was an organic grassroots movement independent of federal support is directly challenged by the author's evidence of massive federal subsidies.
Comparing the choices with the excerpt reveals that the correct choice describes the narrative of 'individualism' and 'rejection of the state' that the author explicitly critiques.

Anahtar Kavram

The political and economic factors driving Sun Belt migration and political realignment in the late twentieth century, including the role of federal defense spending and infrastructure projects.
Tahmini Süre:3m 0s
Bu soruyu puanla