"Provided, That hereafter no Indian nation or tribe within the territory of the United States shall be acknowledged or recognized as an independent nation, tribe, or power with whom the United States may contract by treaty; but no obligation of any treaty lawfully made and ratified with any such Indian nation or tribe prior to March third, eighteen hundred and seventy-one, shall be hereby invalidated or impaired."
— United States Congress, Indian Appropriations Act of 1871
Which of the following was a direct consequence of the policy shift described in the excerpt?
- AThe creation of permanent federal protections to secure tribal communal lands from homesteaders.
- BA federal policy of non-intervention in the West, leaving land disputes to be resolved by private marketplace agreements.
- The passage of legislation to divide reservation lands into individual family plots to promote cultural assimilation.Cevap
- DThe merging of all remaining Native American populations into a single, unified territory with centralized tribal representation.
Cevap
The passage of legislation to divide reservation lands into individual family plots to promote cultural assimilation.
The correct answer is correct because the ending of treaty-making with the Indian Appropriations Act of 1871 marked a transition to direct congressional control over Native American affairs. This unilateral authority paved the way for the Dawes Severalty Act of 1887, which sought to dismantle tribal sovereignty and communal landholdings by partitioning reservations into individual family plots to force cultural assimilation.
Adım Adım Çözüm
Anahtar Kavram
The shift in federal Indian policy from treaty-making to unilateral assimilation policies in the late nineteenth century.
Tahmini Süre:1m 30s