Soru

Zorluk: OrtaIdeological and Legal Debates over Slavery

"In all social systems there must be a class to do the menial duties, to perform the drudgery of life. That is, a class requiring but a low order of intellect and but little development of soul, of beauty, or of grace. It constitutes the very mud-sill of society and of political government... Fortunately for the South, she found a race adapted to that purpose to her hand... We use them for our purpose, and call them slaves... [The North's] whole hireling class of manual laborers and 'operatives,' as you call them, are essentially slaves. The difference between us is, that our slaves are hired for life and well compensated; there is no starvation, no begging, no want of employment among our slaves... Yours are hired by the day, not cared for, and scantily compensated."
—Senator James Henry Hammond, speech to the U.S. Senate, March 4, 1858

Which of the following Northern arguments from the 1850s most directly challenged the perspective expressed in the excerpt?

  1. A
    The executive branch of the federal government should exercise direct authority over new territories to decide their slave or free status through popular sovereignty.
  2. Free labor was economically and socially superior because it provided workers with dignity, a share of their production, and the opportunity for upward social mobility.Cevap
  3. C
    The primary source of sectional conflict was federal tariff policy, which unfairly favored Northern industrial interests at the expense of Southern agrarian economies.
  4. D
    Chattel slavery in the South was legally and economically equivalent to colonial-era indentured servitude, as both groups possessed contract-based pathways to eventual citizenship.

Cevap

Free labor was economically and socially superior because it provided workers with dignity, a share of their production, and the opportunity for upward social mobility.
The Northern free-labor ideology argued that a society of free workers was more productive, moral, and democratic than a slave-based society. This directly contradicted the 'mudsill' argument, which claimed that manual laborers were doomed to a subordinate status equivalent to slavery. The free-labor perspective emphasized that free workers possessed the dignity and opportunity to improve their economic and social standing over time.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the stimulus to identify the author's argument.
Senator James Henry Hammond argues that society requires a 'mudsill' class to perform menial labor, defending Southern slavery as a stable system that cares for its workers, while criticizing Northern free labor ('hireling class') as insecure and exploitative.
Understanding the core argument of the proslavery 'mudsill theory' is necessary to determine what ideological counterargument would challenge it.
2
Evaluate the options to find the Northern perspective that directly challenges this argument.
The Northern free-labor ideology asserted that manual labor is honorable, leads to economic progress, and allows workers the opportunity for upward social mobility, directly contradicting Hammond's claim that laborers are permanently degraded and equivalent to slaves.
This step identifies the correct historical counter-perspective that directly addresses the core claims of the stimulus.

Anahtar Kavram

The clash between Southern proslavery ideology (Mudsill Theory) and Northern free-labor ideology.
Tahmini Süre:1m 30s
Bu soruyu puanla