"That which lies common, and hath never beene replenished or subdued, [is] free to any that will possesse and improve it. . . . As for the Natives in New England, they inclose noe Land, neither have any setled habitation, nor any tame Cattle to improve the Land by, and soe have noe other but a Naturall Right to those Countries . . ."
— John Winthrop, *General Considerations for the Plantation in New England*, 1629
Which of the following colonial developments or policies did the ideas expressed in the excerpt most directly justify?
- The displacement of indigenous populations to establish permanent, family-based agricultural settlements.Cevap
- BThe incorporation of Native Americans into a formal system of coerced agricultural labor and tribute payments.
- CThe expansion of large cash-crop plantations dependent on indentured servants to secure New England's trade.
- DThe formation of a single diplomatic alliance to manage relations with a culturally uniform indigenous population.
Cevap
The displacement of indigenous populations to establish permanent, family-based agricultural settlements.
The correct answer is correct because John Winthrop justifies colonial land acquisition by arguing that Native Americans did not have a civil right to the land because they did not 'subdue' it through European-style agricultural enclosure, cultivation, or livestock ownership. This rationale was directly used by English settlers in New England to justify displacing indigenous groups to establish permanent, family-based agricultural towns.
Adım Adım Çözüm
Anahtar Kavram
English colonization patterns in New England and justifications for land acquisition.
Tahmini Süre:1m 0s