A group of citizens in a state lobbies for a state constitutional amendment that would lower the voting age to sixteen for municipal and school board elections. Opponents of the measure argue that the U.S. Constitution sets a national standard of eighteen for voting, making the state proposal unconstitutional.
Which of the following constitutional arguments best supports the legality of the proposed state amendment?
- The Twenty-Sixth Amendment prohibits states from denying the vote to citizens eighteen or older on account of age, but it does not restrict states from using their reserved powers to lower the voting age.Cevap
- BThe Twenty-Sixth Amendment establishes a uniform national voting age of eighteen for all levels of government, thereby prohibiting states from creating lower age qualifications for local elections.
- CArticle I, Section 4 of the Constitution grants the federal government the exclusive authority to determine voter qualifications in all elections, overriding state qualifications.
- DThe Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment requires states to maintain identical voting qualifications for federal, state, and local elections.
Cevap
The argument that the Twenty-Sixth Amendment prohibits states from denying the vote to citizens eighteen or older on account of age, but does not restrict states from using their reserved powers to lower the voting age.
The correct answer is correct because the Twenty-Sixth Amendment prevents states from denying the right to vote to citizens who are eighteen years of age or older, but it does not establish a maximum or uniform voting age. Under the Tenth Amendment, states retain the reserved power to regulate state and local elections, which includes the authority to extend voting rights to younger citizens (such as sixteen-year-olds) for local contests.
Adım Adım Çözüm
Anahtar Kavram
Division of power between federal standards and state implementation under the Constitution and the Twenty-Sixth Amendment
Tahmini Süre:2m 0s