Which of the following is a correct comparison of the arguments in Federalist No. 51 and Brutus No. 1?
- AFederalist No. 51: A large republic is the most effective mechanism for controlling the influence of factions.
Brutus No. 1: A small republic is necessary because citizens cannot be properly represented in a large nation. - Federalist No. 51: Separation of powers and checks and balances are necessary to protect liberty from government encroachment.
Brutus No. 1: A large, centralized republic will lead to tyranny because representatives will be too distant from the people.Cevap - CFederalist No. 51: A single executive is necessary to ensure energy, decision, activity, and secrecy in the administration of government.
Brutus No. 1: A standing army in peacetime is a threat to the liberty of the citizens and should be prohibited. - DFederalist No. 51: The judiciary must have lifetime tenure to maintain independence and perform judicial review of legislative acts.
Brutus No. 1: The power of the federal government to levy taxes will ultimately destroy the authority of the states.
Cevap
The correct comparison is that Federalist No. 51 argues that separation of powers and checks and balances protect liberty, while Brutus No. 1 argues that a large, centralized republic leads to tyranny because representatives are too distant from the people.
The correct comparison correctly states the central thesis of Federalist No. 51—that dividing power among branches (separation of powers) and giving them the means to check one another prevents tyranny—and matches it with the central thesis of Brutus No. 1—that a large, centralized republic distances representatives from constituents, leading to elite rule and tyranny.
Adım Adım Çözüm
Anahtar Kavram
Comparison of Federalist No. 51 and Brutus No. 1 core arguments.