A political scientist writes the following:
"The institutional structure of American elections forces a psychological calculation on the voter. A citizen who favors a minor-party candidate must decide whether to cast a ballot that represents their true preference but has virtually no chance of victory, or to vote for a major-party candidate who is less ideal but has a realistic chance of winning."
Based on the passage, which of the following is the most direct consequence of the winner-take-all electoral system on voter behavior?
- Voters are incentivized to engage in strategic voting, supporting a major-party candidate to avoid casting a ballot for a candidate who is unlikely to win.Cevap
- BStates are constitutionally required to allocate their electoral votes proportionally when a third-party candidate wins a county-level plurality.
- CVoters rely primarily on retrospective voting models to evaluate whether a third party has historically won control of congressional committees.
- DInterest groups are legally required to run candidates as third-party nominees to lobby members of the executive branch.
Cevap
Voters are incentivized to engage in strategic voting, supporting a major-party candidate to avoid casting a ballot for a candidate who is unlikely to win.
The correct option is correct because the passage describes strategic voting, where voters support a major-party candidate to avoid wasting their vote on a minor-party candidate who is unlikely to win in a winner-take-all system.
Adım Adım Çözüm
Anahtar Kavram
Third-Party Dynamics and Electoral Obstacles
Tahmini Süre:1m 0s