The passage below is adapted from a speech delivered by Ken Saro-Wiwa, a Nigerian environmental activist, during his trial in 1995:
'We are stood before a situation where a multi-national oil company, Shell, has, with the active connivance of successive Nigerian military regimes, waged an ecological war against the Ogoni people. The Ogoni have been subjected to the degrading impacts of oil exploration: gas flaring, oil spills, and the destruction of our agricultural land and fishing waters. All this is done in the name of global progress and international trade, yet the local people receive none of the wealth. Instead, we are left with a ruined environment and political marginalization. We must resist this economic and environmental violence, which treats our homeland as a sacrifice zone for the benefit of distant shareholders and global markets.'
The resistance described in the passage is best understood as a critique of which of the following aspects of late twentieth-century globalization?
- AThe direct annexation and political administration of resource-rich territories in Africa by Western governments seeking to secure fossil fuels.
- The capacity of transnational corporations to leverage global economic integration to extract resources from developing nations, while externalizing environmental costs to local populations.Cevap
- CThe failure of Green Revolution agricultural technologies to improve crop yields in Sub-Saharan Africa, leading to widespread famine.
- DThe homogenization of global culture, which eroded indigenous religious beliefs and traditional social hierarchies.