Soru

Zorluk: KolayIdentifying Implied Meanings

During night operations, naval watchstanders on the bridge switch all interior lighting from white to dim red light. White light immediately resets the human eye's adaptation to darkness, requiring nearly thirty minutes for night vision to recover. In contrast, red light preserves this adaptation, allowing crew members to examine navigational charts while still scanning the surrounding dark waters.

Based on the passage, it can be inferred that using white light on the bridge would:

  1. A
    make printed navigational charts impossible for crew members to read
  2. impair the crew's ability to spot objects outside in the darknessCevap
  3. C
    permanently damage the vision of the watchstanders
  4. D
    switch all interior lighting from white to dim red light

Cevap

impair the crew's ability to spot objects outside in the darkness
The author explains that white light resets darkness adaptation, requiring thirty minutes to recover, whereas red light allows watchstanders to look outside and scan dark waters. This implies that turning on white light would hinder the crew's night vision and prevent them from spotting objects in the surrounding dark sea.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Examine the passage for details regarding the effects of white light versus red light.
White light resets the eye's adaptation to darkness for thirty minutes, while red light preserves night vision so crew members can scan dark waters.
Contrasting the two types of light clarifies the purpose of avoiding white light.
2
Deduce the practical implication of losing darkness adaptation.
Without dark adaptation, watchstanders cannot effectively see outside into the dark waters.
Connecting the loss of dark adaptation to night lookout duties provides the implied consequence.

Anahtar Kavram

Deducing unstated consequences from contrasting details
Bu soruyu puanla