In Australia, people from many different backgrounds live together and may have very different views on political or social issues. Which of the following statements correctly describes the Australian value regarding the use of violence or intimidation to resolve such differences?
- Violence and intimidation are never acceptable ways to resolve conflict or to try to change the government or the law.Cevap
- BViolence is a legitimate tool for social change if it is used to support a cause that is considered fair and just by the community.
- CThreatening or intimidating others is an acceptable way to express a strong opinion, provided that no physical harm or property damage occurs.
Cevap
Violence and intimidation are never acceptable ways to resolve conflict or to try to change the government or the law.
The correct answer is correct because a fundamental principle of Australian society is that differences must be settled through discussion, peaceful negotiation, and the democratic process. Violence and intimidation are seen as threats to the peace and stability of the nation and are never permitted under any circumstances.
Adım Adım Çözüm
Anahtar Kavram
The absolute rejection of violence and intimidation as methods for conflict resolution or social change.
İpuçları
1
Think about how Australia's commitment to the 'rule of law' affects how we treat people we disagree with.
2
Does Australian law allow for any exceptions where hitting someone or threatening them is okay because you have a good reason?
3
Consider that both physical harm and psychological threats (intimidation) are treated as violations of Australian values.
Daha Fazla Pratik
Review the section on 'Peaceful Disagreement' to understand how Australians are expected to debate topics they feel strongly about.
Tahmini Süre:45s