An independent software vendor (ISV) is transitioning its application from a traditional on-premises hosting model to AWS. Under the old model, the ISV had to invest heavily in purchasing physical servers and storage arrays before launch to ensure the application could support its projected user base. On AWS, the ISV plans to deploy resources on-demand and scale them dynamically. Which option correctly identifies the primary AWS Cloud benefit demonstrated by this shift, along with the correct financial or operational rationale?
- ABenefiting from massive economies of scale, which is achieved by dynamically scaling compute capacity up or down in response to real-time application traffic demands.
- BTrading variable expense for capital expense, which enables the ISV to capitalize their monthly AWS usage invoices to build long-term infrastructure assets on their balance sheet.
- Trading capital expense for variable expense, which allows the ISV to pay only for the resources they consume rather than investing heavily in physical data centers and servers before using them.Cevap
- DIncreasing speed and agility, which is achieved by utilizing tightly coupled, monolithic server deployments to minimize latency between applications.
Cevap
Trading capital expense for variable expense, which allows the ISV to pay only for the resources they consume rather than investing heavily in physical data centers and servers before using them.
The correct option is correct because the ISV is shifting from upfront investments in physical infrastructure (capital expenses) to a model where they pay for resources on-demand (variable expenses). This directly matches the AWS Cloud benefit of trading capital expense for variable expense.
Adım Adım Çözüm
Anahtar Kavram
Trading capital expense for variable expense allows organizations to avoid heavy upfront hardware costs and instead pay only for what they consume, shifting costs from CapEx to OpEx.
Tahmini Süre:2m 0s